View Single Post
Old
11-20-2013, 08:48 PM
  #108
ck20
Registered User
 
ck20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 1,236
vCash: 500
Failing to see any sort of logic behind gunning for Havlat. Why would we have traded Gaborik to go for an older, more injury-prone, worse version of him? Unless Havlat is just some sort of throw-in..but a throw-in with a $5mil cap hit? Are we trading Pyatt and Pouliot++ too? Why would we trade ~3 roster players for Havlat and picks/cheap prospects? Don't see how a deal involving Havlat could possibly fit in with the Rangers from any rational, "This make our team better" standpoint.

ck20 is offline