Thread: Post-Game Talk: Rangers at Lightning 11/25/13
View Single Post
11-26-2013, 10:32 AM
Bleed Ranger Blue
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 18,465
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by SnowblindNYR View Post
I'm not sure you know what delusions of grandeur mean, thinking that the team is better than it is (arguable but a legit opinion) is not synonymous with delusions of grandeur, you're using a term that you don't know the definition of to sound smart. They're getting far more chances but are not finishing. It's not all bad angle shots. When all they had was terrible shots against LA I called them out on it. I thought the same thing happened for the most part against Anaheim. I'm not shy about saying when the Rangers have cupcake chances. That 11-12 team wasn't that great defensively. They just had Lundqvist in his peak season. I remember when we had like 5 straight games where we gave up at least 1 breakaway. The D sucked yesterday and against Dallas, however for the most part they've been pretty damn good since the horrible start. Even including last night's debacle the team has given up 34 goals in the last 19 games. That's fewer than 2 goals per game and that includes a bunch of fluke goals and a Lundqvist that is having his worst season in years. The 11-12 team in March that year had Lundqvist play like he's playing now they gave up at least 3 goals in pretty much every game. That team was all Lundqvist and Gabby. Somehow our offensive scrubs scored timely goals.
I know exactly what delusions of grandeur means. This post, and the other fluff you've posted throughout this thread is a perfect example of it.

This is a 12-12 team that is tied for 29th in the league in goal scoring, yet, according to you, they should be 16-8? Where do you come up with this stuff? Does it come directly out of your ass, or is it filtered elsewhere?

Bleed Ranger Blue is offline   Reply With Quote