: Confirmed with Link:
August 2012: Scott Hartnell Signs Extension (6 years, $4.75m cap hit, limited NMC)
View Single Post
11-26-2013, 11:54 PM
Failure is an Option
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Upper Darby
Originally Posted by
Handing out such a contract after the player is having a career year is always risky.
He is overpaid but the cap will go up to mitigate the effect on the team.
I guess we can't bank on getting another amnesty buyout anytime soon?
I fear that Giroux's new contract will sting just as much as Hartsy's next year.
Signing a player like Hartnell to that contract after a career year at his age isn't risky it's dumb. The odds of him playing to that level again with the physical style he plays which will probably cause him to slow down and get injured more often than other players plus with his career year being so much higher than other years at at a relatively late age for the NHL. Just dumb. Giroux contract might turn out to be bad but from what he's show and his age there is legitimate reason to expect the level of play Giroux is paid for than Hartnell.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by whatthef