View Single Post
Old
01-01-2007, 10:27 PM
  #19
Talent Analyst
Registered User
 
Talent Analyst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: 100th years
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,046
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by no name View Post
O'Sullivan is a world class talent and Lats is not. The Kings are not a young team. They are an old team with 4 young players. Crawford put Sully on the 4th line and gave him 6 minutes a game. No one ever said he had a bad work ethic and you penalizing him for not being "overly large" is silly at best.
Talent isn't mean everyting . If it is , Kostitsyn is a better prospect than O'Sullivan and I don't think he's . Latendresse would become a first line power foward , like Bertuzzi . And its better than what I project for O'Sullivan .

Talent Analyst is offline   Reply With Quote