View Single Post
12-03-2013, 12:41 AM
Registered User
Tackla's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2013
Country: Canada
Posts: 413
vCash: 500
I mentioned Carolina because it's the 27th most valuable team, a bottom-feeder franchise, and it was mentioned earlier in the thread. There are a number of other teams I could mention. None of these benefactors of revenue sharing are any more stable than they were before the newest Canadian TV deal was signed. When their leases end, these teams can very well be on the move and the NHL won't mind or intervene because it will have fulfilled the promise it co-signed and will be in the clear to relocate, unlike in the Phoenix situation that would've damaged the NHL's reputation if they relocated. But people will believe what they want to believe, like having owners that would take a loss just to keep their team in an apathetic market. Yeah right!

Tackla is offline