Thread: Prospect Info: OKC Barons 2013/14
View Single Post
Old
12-09-2013, 01:40 PM
  #283
CupofOil
Registered User
 
CupofOil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rock Bottom
Country: United States
Posts: 13,667
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LTIR View Post
Yet most of our players from down there have played good when called up..
Larsen, Arcobello, Pitlick have all looked good .. Omark is putting up big numbers in the graveyard.. Lander looks pretty good as well... Hartikainen, Rajala, Pitlick all had decent seasons last year.. J.Schultz\Ebs etc had a good stint too.

Just because guys like Curtin Hamilton, Teubert and Plante did not pan out does not make Nelson a bad coach.
Larsen is incredibly overrated. He skates very fast and makes a few nice passes, not much else. He was groomed in the Dallas system anyway.
Pitlick looked good in a few games, doesn't really mean much. He accomplished virtually nothing in OKC. Lets see if he can become an NHL regular, the jury is still out on him.
Arcobello looks ok but he's not really a part of the future of this team IMO.
Hartikainen and Rajala are currently playing overseas.
Omark is not an NHL prospect anymore.
I actually like Lander but he is only now starting to discover some offensive touch after a couple of stagnant seasons in OKC. Will he be any more than a 4th line center? I'm not so sure.
Marincin is ok but it's not like he has taken big steps forward over the past few seasons.
Who can you point to and say that the player was successfully developed through the farm system? Is there even one overachiever in the group, just one?
The idea of a farm system is to develop players for NHL readiness and the farm system has churned out very few NHL successes. Petry looks like the only one thus far, possibly Arcobello as well. Most of the others have been swings and misses.

CupofOil is offline   Reply With Quote