Did Losing Dubinsky and Prust Crush the Rangers
View Single Post
12-13-2013, 07:44 PM
Join Date: Aug 2011
Originally Posted by
Makes me sick when people call 11-12 a fluke. I love that team and season
Yeh, you know I was for the Nash trade thinking the Rangers needed one more gamebreaker to put them over the top.
I never thought instead they'd get a washed up player and become the Gomez Rangers.
The 11 and 12 Rangers weren't the most talented, no team with Sather as GM will be, however every game they played, they played hard, with hustle, and that was fun.
We didn't want to lost this part of the team, we just wanted to have another scorer.
Begs the question:
1) Did we really the star in Nash? Was there somebody else who could have provided 1/2nd line consistent offense?
2) Would Columbus have done the deal without Dubi? Could Del Zotto or Hagelin been subed?
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by rkhum