When this team is healthy, it's still not that good
View Single Post
12-18-2013, 10:34 AM
Join Date: Jul 2007
Originally Posted by
the title of this thread is a little misleading, "when this team is healthy, it's still not that good". This may be true, but we haven't had a chance to see this, the team hasn't been healthy since early November and at that point they WERE good. Bozak still isn't back Bolland probably won't be back this year, Lupul just got back etc. the full team hasn't been healthy as of late, so this team can't be assessed as a healthy team. Right now this team is playing terrible and are not getting the breaks they did in October, but to say this team isn't good even when healthy cannot be done until they ARE healthy.
How do you figure we were VERY good? I think you're stretching the term if you think bottom 5 in shots for and against and heavy reliance on special teams and hot goalies is 'very good'. We overachieved with a healthy lineup - there's nothing to indicate this wouldn't be happening with a full lineup.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by dubplatepressure