View Single Post
12-20-2013, 09:25 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,474
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by RangersHank View Post
And to everyone saying you make that trade all the time, why? Why did we NEED Nash? We couldnt make a package for a guy like Ryan? Why did it need to be Nash? I like Nash but it feels like we are in the same place when we had Gaborik, just without the hard work and less hitting. I would have traded those guys for a different player. Dubinsky, Anisimov, Erixon and a 1st doesnt just get you Nash, i'm sure it could have brought in a decent top 6 winger or center. We lost in the ECF because of the lack of depth, why not add somr depth in the offseason.

People say that team couldnt do it again, how do you know? The team got ripped apart right after so how does anybody know they couldnt do it again?If another top 6 forward, bottom 6 forward and a depth dman gets added to that team, who knows? But you cant say it was luck because its BS. They all played the same style and everyone stuck to the system. Add to it, dont destroy it.
Thank you. Everyday I was saying don't go for Nash go for Ryan or seguin or erikkson or eberle or e Kane. Someone in the 21-25 range who will be coming into their prime. Sather really dropped the ball since our ECF appearance, we headed in the right direction traded for Nash ran into injuries then traded Gaborik and went lateral. Now we took a step back

theFiGS is online now   Reply With Quote