"Rangers eye deal" - Brooks
View Single Post
01-14-2007, 08:49 AM
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Atlanta, B&R in NYC
Originally Posted by
You'd like to think so, but given Sather's history and Renney's apparent decision that he does not need a 23 year-old 30 goal scorer, it would not shock me. It is EXACTLY the kind of move that this organization has made over it's history. There is a reason as to why this team has only one Cup in 66 years.
There are at least 2 things wrong with Brooks' story:
1. why would a team over pay for a player they could have had for free.
2. why didn't JD jump all over it. Do you think someone is going to offer more?
Prucha and Hall together are just 14 years older than Ruchinsky! Brooks' 3rd party me thinks is another bafoon, this time from Ottawa.
Orpik ($1M) or Malone ($1.3M) I could see for Hall ($975T) and Rachunek ($1.8M). That I would buy. You have to look at salaries now and Brooks doesn't do that.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by ATLANTARANGER*