View Single Post
01-17-2007, 04:55 PM
Puck Fittsburg
Finest's Avatar
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Long Island
Country: United States
Posts: 5,587
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by JRGNYR View Post
Somebody correct me if I'm wrong, but was it not a stipulation of the trade with Washington that if the Rangers were to deal Jagr, Washington would no longer be saddled with half of Jagr's salary, and therefore the team taking on Jagr would have to assume 100% of the remainder of his contract?

I thought I'd read that somewhere, and if it is indeed the case, then Jagr's contract is virtually untradeable in the salary cap world unless the Rangers take back some lousy contracts themselves. But depending on what youth and/or picks also comes back in a trade, it could be worth it.

Might all be in vain though, since Jagr said if he's not playing for the Rangers, he'd be in Europe...
I remember reading something similar also, so I think you correct in saying that if Jagr gets traded Washington is off the hook for their half of the contract.

Finest is offline   Reply With Quote