View Single Post
12-30-2013, 09:17 PM
Registered User
Ryker's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Triangle, NC, USA
Country: Slovenia
Posts: 4,979
vCash: 500
What is your metric when evaluating Holmgren as a GM?

There have been multiple threads on Holmgren as a GM, but to me it seems it's always playing on uneven or unknown ground, because people don't really state what their metric for evaluation is. So I was just wondering whether people that participate in those threads (or even those that don't, but have an opinion about it) could post what their metric was, so that the next time this thing comes up, we can see where people are coming from and not just shooting arguments all over the place without even defining the rules of the discussion.

In particular, when does that metric tip over to "he's done a bad job and should be replaced" and/or "he's doing a good job and should keep it"?

Ryker is offline   Reply With Quote