View Single Post
01-06-2014, 05:34 PM
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Country: Norway
Posts: 527
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Placid View Post
Ice skating (be it figure skating, hockey or what have you) has really never been a priority here, which is a shame (exception being speed skating).
*Cough*Sonia Henie*cough*

Originally Posted by Ilovemymum View Post
We have 44. Denmark has 25. (according to IIHF). Denmark has 7 NHL players, while we just one little guy.
It's not just in the # of rinks, but how you use them. We also have 5 % of the country covered by water, with large parts frozen in the winter, but only occationaly does someone bother to play shinny on them (Zuke probably an exeption). Much easier to complain about the number of rinks. It's just not part of the culture, and the federation are failing at making it so. I bet most of the NHLers first skating was outdoor on a pond. In Norway it seems that everybody needs to attend hockeyschool for kids in order to learn it. Too organized IMO, and not the way to make it a bigger sport. The hockey federation, idrettsforbundet (athletes federation), just like the soccer federation, doesn't like people to play for fun it seems, and then you get all focus on making eliteplayers while failing to do what they should: enhance public health (and while you're at it make people enjoy moving their legs for fun, widening the recruitment and make it a part of the Norwegian wintersports wonder.) Some of the controversy with Zuke and his betting agreement was just about this. He claimed he learned his skills from the pond and the parking lot and didn't really Owe the Norwegain state owned betting company anything. The Norwegian hockeyfederation With their narrow minds were, understandably, shaking in their pants as they pay the largest part of all New rinks, but at the same time failing to get the point: Our only NHLer didn't learn his amazing stickhandling skills at any state financed rink but at a frozen parking lot. Sure later he developed in these rinks, but he started out where all kids should start out: With pond hockey. I actually tried to suggest it through the Kitchen door, that they should really really make an effort to make the best of the thousand possibilites there are, but never heard back and I lost my energy. The potential is endless in Norway, right in front of Our eyes, but we fail to grasp it. Screw the rinks.
Firstly, they have 25 rinks, but because their country is tiny tiny tiny, and heavily populated, more people have access to rinks. Due to Norway being pretty huge in comparison, most of Norwegian poplulation does not have access to a rink within half an hour drive.

As for Norways geography, most of the people live close to the coast, and the water doesn't freeze that good here, and we almost never have stable weather long enough to consistently organize any type of sport. Therefore, building rinks have never been in high demand, because the grass root organizations aren't there.

The problem are tightly connected to the lack of rual rinks, something that inhibits the sport of getting traction nationally (when only 2/10 knows the rules), which again leads to a lack of media, which again leads to lower revenue from sponsors/spectators etc, which again leads to a worse product, that leads to lower recruiting, something that in turn leads to worse match ups for the talent that DO find their way into ice hockey.

tldr; yhea, If Zuccarello had lived 6 hours further north, he wouldn't be a hockey player.

anofsti is offline   Reply With Quote