View Single Post
01-13-2014, 05:37 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,126
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Jonathan. View Post
Holy Christ. The #1 seed in the East is not a ****ing underdog.
Okay, again, you haven't answered it once, were the Rangers at the level of ANY of those teams.

Let me know, genuinely, if you think the Rangers were at that level instead of just going back to their conference seeding.

Do you not acknowledge that they over achieved, to any degree? Or do you think the Rangers were a dynamo machine that season plowing past each team.

Let's view this objectively instead of just saying "#1 seed" over and over.

How would they have looked if they faced a legitimate team in the post season? They could barely handle #8 and #7 and lost to #6.

Last edited by Fataldogg: 01-13-2014 at 05:43 PM.
Fataldogg is offline