View Single Post
Old
01-28-2007, 01:11 PM
  #83
squilber
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Country: United States
Posts: 53
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by nyr7andcounting View Post
I mean to say there's a good chance he'll be one of the top 10 players at his position when he's in his prime. Of course he's not a franchise player yet. But the problem is I don't see him getting much NHL time with us, and if we hang on to him for too long than his value may decline.

The most he's going to play next year is 25-30 games as an NHL backup, and that's only if they decide to bring him up rather than go with a veteran backup. They might think it's better to let him play 60 games in Hartford.

The point is he's probably never going to be our starter. And it doesn't make sense to keep such a valuable player if he's never going to play. He's going to be moved at some point, so we might as well do it when his value is at it's highest.
I don't know about that. Lundquist has been up and down this year. Not stellar by any means. If it continues, you never know.

squilber is offline   Reply With Quote