View Single Post
01-18-2014, 11:05 AM
Registered User
SKS's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: San Francisco
Country: United States
Posts: 405
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by SingaporeRanger View Post
Love Zucc but I just don't see bumping him from 1.15 to 4m a year is a viable solution. He will have limited value on the open market due to his size and even though a good playmaker and invaluable to Rangers right now I just don't see a huge contract as something that he'll get.

3 year at 2.5 - 2.75 would be pretty good in my book right now.
I can guarantee you that management is very aware that 1.15 is not representative, and as media reports surfaced seemed to be team discount because of a difficult situation with Step. Based on my personal experience in negotiations it seems very likely that Zucc received some kind of "if you perform, you will be paid" incentive when he took that deal.

2.5-2.7 seems very far off to me. Best case for that money they would only be able to cover his one rfa year.

As for his value to other teams. Trust me, they are seeing what we are seeing and every GM with a line short of a playmaker like Zucc is drooling over him now
Edit: I almost wake myself from the nightmares of a 2nd Pitt line of Neal, Malkin, and Zucc. Just imagining such a scenario makes it evident to me that his value is high around the league.

SKS is offline   Reply With Quote