View Single Post
Old
01-31-2014, 03:23 PM
  #31
TheDevilMadeMe
Global Moderator
 
TheDevilMadeMe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Brooklyn
Country: United States
Posts: 42,603
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by tarheelhockey View Post
Putting their adjusted seasons side-by-side:

JagrLemieux
145165
144156
131141
121129
120127
117116
105110
99103
97102
9191
9082
8679
8640
7735
7633
7621
6610
610
590
510

Lemieux was about 10 points better per year at their respective 5-year peaks. They were about even (separated by 5 points or less) for their next 5 best years. Then there are 10 years where Jagr was producing anywhere from 7 to 61 more points per season.

And keep in mind that Jagr lost a full season to labor strife, plus 3 more to overseas play. The longevity difference between them really is huge when you start taking fragmentary seasons and missed seasons into account (Jagr having 7 more seasons of active play to date, 9 seasons of 81+ GP compared to Mario's 0, 14 seasons of 70+GP compared to Mario's 6, etc...).

I don't think it's Potvin vs Lidstrom, more like Orr vs Lidstrom. Very few people would take Lidstrom in that comparison, but there are a few out there who would and they do have a rational reason to justify that choice.
Adjusted points underrate 1st line players from the 1980s and thereabouts by a good deal, since they are based off league average scoring, and not the scoring of 1st line players.

A percentile method like Vs2 or VsX is a far superior method for comparing the offense of players of this calibre.

TheDevilMadeMe is online now   Reply With Quote