View Single Post
02-03-2014, 06:15 PM
True Blue
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 16,036
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by vipernsx View Post
That's why you pay what he's worth and not more. The guy is only 27. In 2 years when he's 29 and making 3-4m a year for 2-3 more years, the Rangers could cash in with a truly quality return.

I say sign him to a 5year 17.5m contract that pays him 6 and 5 mil his first two years. Any team with an internal cap would take him after year 2 even if his cap hit wasn't worth it.

Over the next 5 years any player at or under 4m will be right on par with league average and far from overpaid.
Stralman should not be given a 5 year contract. He has been good for the Rangers. he has not been great. Not on a consistent basis has he performed like a top-4 defenseman. There is no guarantee you can trade him in two years. If he gets a 5 or 6 year deal and decides to coast, then it is rather difficult to try to trade that off.

True Blue is offline   Reply With Quote