View Single Post
Old
02-07-2014, 02:47 AM
  #159
Matt19Oilers
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,126
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paralyzer008 View Post
For what supposedly is a good enough offense, anyone else notice we're still 20th in goals for?

Yet we're still trading skilled guys for goons? Not saying some guys don't have to go like Sam Gagner for example, but for Clifford? Seriously? This team still needs offense on top of what it has already.

Underrated stat though: Oilers lead the league in 4 on 4 goals, shows how much speed the top guys have, but still, we aren't even a solid offensive team sadly.
I don't think that this team needs more offence "on paper" than it currently has. To me, this team needs:

1) Better d-men to move the puck quickly out of the zone, instead of the old brain-dead "shoot it around the boards back to the other team's defenseman at the point."

2) Top 6 forwards that are better at retrieving and protecting the puck deep in the offensive zone. Part of the reason that we hardly get any offensive zone time against the elite teams is that after we dump the puck in, our smurf forwards get eaten alive by the other team's d-men due to being physically over matched.

What I'm saying is that down-grading our offence on paper may actually make it better if we can acquire the two things that I mentioned above. I'm not suggesting putting 10 goal 3rd line plugs in our top 6, but there are guys of the 20 goal, 40 point ilk that we should be looking to acquire for the top 6. These types of forwards may look like downgrades on paper, but the ability to retrieve and protect the puck is an absolutely crucial ability that our smurfs are lacking, despite that it isn't always noticeable on the scoresheet.

Matt19Oilers is offline