View Single Post
02-07-2014, 12:49 PM
Checked out
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hiking
Country: Canada
Posts: 48,856
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Krut View Post
The councillors that voted this down even said that Katz's proposal is the best.

City staff were going to consolidate anyways, and it was determined that this was the best offer.

Considering that this is essentially an entirely new council, I have doubts that any of them are involved in any conspiratorial agreements with the Katz Group.
The difference in how we're viewing this is you have blind faith in the administration that made this decision. Its being questioned a lot. It should be questioned.

Again, council voted against this Katz proposal that the city occupy and lease the proposed Katz tower. This being a democratic vote democratically by the representatives of this city that are VOTED on to city council.

This decision later being overturned by an administrative body. That nobody voted in.

As to the bid process criticism of the process was saying Katz was going to win all along. Is it because he had the best bid? How would you know? How would any of us know.

16 bids, just curiously the bid likely to be the most controversial won. Who didn't see that coming?

Last edited by Replacement*: 02-07-2014 at 12:59 PM.
Replacement* is offline