View Single Post
02-10-2014, 09:10 PM
Registered User
BlowbyBlow's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,411
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Oi'll say! View Post
I dunno about that, Tavares and Duchene are there instead of C Giroux and that smacks of potential more than recent play or experience.
You have to look at Crosby (2006), and Stamkos (2010) as recent examples. Tavares and Duchene have one more year than Hall, and it almost fills the quote for underage players, when you realize Duchene is a thirteen forward - who should probably be ahead of Nash and Carter to an extent.

No offense to St. Louis, but Giroux should have been chosen over him, or even Hall. To me its unfair Giroux is not on the team, Hall most could live with.

BlowbyBlow is offline