Thread: Speculation: Justin Schultz's extension
View Single Post
02-26-2014, 01:58 PM
misfit's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: just north of...ever
Posts: 16,258
vCash: 50
Originally Posted by CornKicker View Post
another argument against the bridge contract is you then have a contract expiring in 2 years right around the time klefbom/marincin need new deals
I'm less worried about their contracts as I would be in the risk/reward of Schultz's deal itself, and our ability to use the cap space we have in the immediate future to help us with the potential cap issues we might have down the line.

If you are offended by this post, it's probably because you're ugly.
misfit is offline   Reply With Quote