View Single Post
Old
02-27-2014, 04:33 PM
  #513
armandh01
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,355
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CupofOil View Post
The thing is that we don't need a superstar from this draft. What we need is an impact player who fills a need.
I think a good comparable for Ekblad is Seabrook. Not a sexy name but the type of player that we can really use, same with a Bergeron type. I haven't seen Bennett play so i can't really make a judgment on him.
There aren't a lot of dynamic talents at the top of this draft and quite frankly, i think that works in our favor because we don't need another dynamic player.

The thing I like about Reinhart more than Ekblad is that it creates an asset up front to deal imo. So we can fill two significant holes by dealing a skilled winger for a Dman in the ilk of someone like Tyutin, Voynov, Bogosian, Josi with teams of excess D or lack of scoring.

Hall - Nuge - Yak
X - Reinhart - Perron

We would likely not have a 1D but a future of Schultz, Klefbom, Nurse, Marincin, Petry + traded asset is not a bad future on the back end tbh and our C depth would be set for a long time.

armandh01 is offline