Proposal Thread: Trying It Again
View Single Post
02-28-2014, 12:41 PM
Join Date: Sep 2004
Originally Posted by
Not if "taking what you can get" means downgrading significantly in areas that actually matter. Take a guy that's bad defensively and puts up points and replace him with a players who is bad defensively and doesn't put up points, that's a step backwards by any measure.
Yeah because we don't need physical players we just need to add guys like Wellwood, Robert Nilsson, Omark, Schremp, O'Sullivan, Zherdev, Filatov, MAB, Tom Poti, Tom Gilbert, etc. to make this a Cup contender. NEWSFLASH this team IS GOING BACKWARDS WITH GAGNER AND HEMSKY PLAYING KEY ROLES ON IT. Seriously it's obvious that we can't get anything higher end that we really need by trading these guys and we suck with them here and have for many years so what is your plan? Don't shore up the bottom 6 and hope and pray that size in the top 6 falls in our lap? How in the hell does anyone expect change with the same easy to play against bums playing significant roles? It's ****ing mind boggling TBH.
Also how many more games do we lose next season of Mark Arcobello is our 2C than Sam Gagner? Those 6 less points in 7 less games is just going to sink our ship isn't it? Especially since you know Arcobello is +14 better than Sam the Sham.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Bryanbryoil