View Single Post
03-20-2014, 01:00 PM
Registered User
Chelios's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,173
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by pvr View Post
Seriously???!!! That is an absurd statement.

I think he was adequate defensively (I didn't really love his defensive game, but believe that he wasn't as bad as people have made him out to be). However, he was not given a prolonged look in a consistent position that would have been more conducive to his achieving success while on the Hawks. He played 24 games his first stint, and four his second stint. That's not enough time to find out if a rookie with his offensive talent has what it takes to make it in the NHL.

That is a very simple statement that would be hard to logically disagree with, regardless of what some here might think.
You may want to read that over again. I said that was never my argument.

Chelios is offline