View Single Post
Old
02-25-2007, 11:18 AM
  #82
in the hall
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,009
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by WheresBarnaby View Post
Richter was great, but if anyone thinks he never let up a bad goal, your living in a fantasy world. Those of us who lived through the "wonder years" know otherwise. Was he clutch? You bet, It's easy to look through rose colored glasses when we think back, but a brief comparison on stats shows that Henrik actually has the better numbers. Some of the goals Mike let up where pretty bad. He also made some ridiculous saves, just like #30. Get used to it, Hank's not going anywhere.

_____________________ G __W __L _GAA
TOTAL 14 NHL SEASONS 666 301 258 2.89 MIKE

TOTAL 2 NHL SEASONS 103 55 31 2.40 HANK

But what about 94' right? 68 42 12 2.57 MIKE

Hank still has the better GAA, It's the team's play in front that's the difference.
don't even go there

Richter remains the better goalie and one of the more underrated goalies of his era

after the good seasons, for YEARS he'd carry this team and it's awful defense.. then he started to break down

in the hall is offline   Reply With Quote