View Single Post
Old
02-08-2004, 11:48 AM
  #28
Jarnberg
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Nashville
Country: United States
Posts: 5,548
vCash: 500
No, I understand your beef.

Sorry about the last post, I just woke up. Anyway.....

Yes I agree alot of other team's iffy prospects are rated too high. Some of the better prospects are rated a bit high sometimes too. Yes the Nashville ones are a bit low.

I don't however think you can use draft position as a measure of rating. Yes to an extent, but just because they are drafted in the same round doesn't mean they warrant the same rating.

But I do agree that the Nashville prospects are a bit low alot, but maybe its better that way

Jarnberg is offline