: Value of:
Nash and Seabrook
View Single Post
05-02-2014, 07:29 PM
Join Date: Jun 2010
Originally Posted by
The Hawks don't need Nash, but they need Seabrook.
I wouldn't do it.
I suppose the value is there
but such a deal would make no sense for the Hawks.
Thank you for confirming value seems there.
I understand Hawks fans and hope they understand my premise.
Both are correct, but I see how they come to their different conclusion.
[Part of the premise is Chicago wanted space for its Ds, and was better able to juggle adding another F, Nash, on a discount, then keeping Seabrook. I don't think one can argue that C does need slots for Clendenning, Rundblad, etc, but I totally get how that legit fact is not enough to dislodge the value of Seabrook.]
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by bernmeister