Thread: Value of: Nash and Seabrook
View Single Post
05-02-2014, 07:29 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 8,574
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Hawksfan2828 View Post
The Hawks don't need Nash, but they need Seabrook.

I wouldn't do it. I suppose the value is there but such a deal would make no sense for the Hawks.
Thank you for confirming value seems there.
I understand Hawks fans and hope they understand my premise.
Both are correct, but I see how they come to their different conclusion.

[Part of the premise is Chicago wanted space for its Ds, and was better able to juggle adding another F, Nash, on a discount, then keeping Seabrook. I don't think one can argue that C does need slots for Clendenning, Rundblad, etc, but I totally get how that legit fact is not enough to dislodge the value of Seabrook.]

bernmeister is offline   Reply With Quote