Thread: Value of: Nash and Seabrook
View Single Post
Old
05-02-2014, 06:52 PM
  #38
EbonyRaptor
Registered User
 
EbonyRaptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Boonies
Country: United States
Posts: 3,941
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by bernmeister View Post
Thanks, thought Clendening particularly they wanted to make room for, so much so, is the buzz about Rozi going?

This is what was behind my thinking there.
As to the W/C posture, I get it, figured when high enough talent fits usually it can work, but I agree with you.
Clendening strong suit is offense. At best he might be able to in the bottom pairing so he could be sheltered from playing against the opponents best lines. If Seabrook were traded, Hjalmarsson would be able to move up to #2, but there isn't anyone to take Hhalmarsson's spot. Rozsival is RD and still OK as a #6, but no way fills Hjalmarsson's skates as the #3/#4. Trading Seabrook would transform the Hawks d-corps from arguably the best in the league to something much much less.

EbonyRaptor is offline   Reply With Quote