View Single Post
03-22-2007, 06:19 AM
Registered User
pld459666's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Danbury, CT
Country: United States
Posts: 16,665
vCash: 500

Originally Posted by inferno272 View Post
just wondering what you all think now?

And by you all, I am including myself in this.

I stand by my sentiment, he would make a better assistant coach than a head coach. Although its next to impossible to fire a guy because of this miraculous run this team is on, the guy should be on a very short leash (imho)

what about you guys?
A team starts playing desperate, inspired passionate hockey and the coach benefits.

as much as a coach will suffer whan that very same team is playing un-inspired, passionless hockey.

I think that the early season stumblings of this team really brought to light Renney's faults in that he has no real system for checking accountability, hie line combinations are dreadful (more Sather fault due to not getting the play-making center we need).

Renney has the PO's to secure next year. If he can manage to get this group to win a round, I'd have no issues bringing him back. It will show a marked improvement from last year and the year before (pre lockout).

Improvement is what we need to see and a series win will show me that this team has improved from the year before.

pld459666 is online now   Reply With Quote