Thread: Player Discussion: Rick Nash Part II
View Single Post
Old
06-14-2014, 08:16 PM
  #683
dethomas07
Registered User
 
dethomas07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: New York, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 1,222
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by bernmeister View Post
Asterisk to my yes, I want 'enuf' return.
Has more value in returned cap space then in $$ paid.
However, only the correct deal makes sense to move him.

Last night's SCF finale debacle underscores what I mean when I say he is snake bit. He was stopped not on a missed shot, or an unconscious save, but by a defenseman's stck! More precisely the thin shaft of a stick!

Snake bit may or may not come into play next year, but his contract follows him.

However, that is NOT the same as deadwood, which is what Brad Richards has become.


If memory serves, Nash has NMC now, next year is limited NTC.
If he's smart, he makes nice to help us move him, and in exchange we can try to be accommodating as possible.

But if not now, net year for sure.

Buh-bye
exactly... if Nash doesn't get hurt this year dude hits 30+ goals easily.. and that my friends doesn't grow on trees. this is like Gaborik all over again, and look what happened their.. we as rangers fans always think the grass is greener.. get me Dubi back with nash and we dominate.. im just saying we need more intensity out of forwards..


I really look to get ROR, Pavs, or who i really want is Kesler.. Nash is fine, even tho hes had a poor playoff showing for us..

dethomas07 is offline