View Single Post
Old
06-23-2014, 02:06 AM
  #3
Ryker
Registered User
 
Ryker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Triangle, NC, USA
Country: Slovenia
Posts: 3,070
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stizzle View Post
The article is pretty unfair to Stolarz. Obviously he is far from a sure thing. What kid goalie outside the NHL is? Gibson and Vasilevski are about it. The article makes it sound like that is a glaring need, which is very overstated.
How is it unfair to Stolarz? It just mentions there are doubts surrounding him, which is true, is it not? You said yourself he's far from a sure thing. And, yeah, not all other teams have goalies that are a sure thing, but take a look at their prospects and you'll see pretty much all teams have good goalies in their pool. We really have nothing. Stolarz is at least a couple of years away from the NHL and we don't have a backup yet (and certainly not one as good as other teams do).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stizzle View Post
Also, I love this quote... "They have a couple of good prospect centers in Scott Laughton and Nick Cousins, but lack depth outside of those players."
... Our top three centers on the big club are ages 26, 22, and 21. The Flyers aren't exactly worried about center depth, bro.
Look at the context, he was talking about the Flyers needing elite scoring, not center depth. He just mentioned those two, because he felt they come closest to "elite scoring" in terms of our prospects. It'd be laughable to call even them "elite", though.

We are good in terms of defensive prospects, though, so that's good.

Ryker is offline   Reply With Quote