View Single Post
04-18-2007, 09:49 PM
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Mpls
Posts: 3,342
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by RUSqueelin View Post
why the heck is anyone comparing a group of 15 year old kids to a college team?
The first point was the CHL is better because it has more players in the NHL. I used SSM as an example. In 10 years they will have way more NHLers than the Alaska team form the NCAA. But if they played this year. Who would win? AA wins hands down. So why are future acoldaes indicative of how they are better in any given year. It is not. So using future NHLers in not a measuring stick to how well those teams were in the past.

MN_Gopher is offline   Reply With Quote