HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > New York Rangers
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Canadian Press/Pierre Lebrun's NHL training camp preview

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
09-06-2007, 07:05 PM
  #1
RangerBoy
#freejtmiller
 
RangerBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: New York
Country: United States
Posts: 32,810
vCash: 500
Canadian Press/Pierre Lebrun's NHL training camp preview

Quote:
New York Rangers: Some of those who witnessed the Rangers-Sabres second-round series last spring argue Buffalo was lucky to beat New York. If that's the case, the Rangers are on the cusp on great things with the flamboyant additions of Chris Drury and Scott Gomez - the creme de la creme of the free-agent crop and a stunning upgrade at centre. That's the good news. What's not so impressive, however, is a blue-line that simply doesn't scare anyone: Michal Rozsival, Marek Malik, Fedor Tyutin, Thomas Pock, Andrew Hutchinson, Paul Mara, Jason Strudwick and Dan Girardi. Look for GM Glen Sather to upgrade his back end before the trade deadline. In the meantime, one of the league's top coaching staffs led by Tom Renney and the excellent goaltending of Henrik Lundqvist will help the Rangers shoot for the Eastern Conference title. If they add a top blue-liner, this is a legitimate Stanley Cup contender.
http://www.recorder.ca/cp/hockey/070906/h090615A.html

No mention of Marc Staal.Come on Pierre,you are better than that

RangerBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-06-2007, 07:26 PM
  #2
RMcDonagh
New York Rangers Cup
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 6,269
vCash: 500
Here we go again with the defense, you know now it's just like "whatever, ignore it" honestly it is. Hopefully Staal plays some games with us this year, and I'd so love for us to win the cup not only so I can party my ass off and die in peace (even though I'm young and have good chances at seeing more cups from our Rangers) but just for the meer fact of shoving it in these "no blue-line, non contender" faces of these "NHL experts".

RMcDonagh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-06-2007, 07:48 PM
  #3
The Perfect Paradox
Beyond Good and Evil
 
The Perfect Paradox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 6,574
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruno Ranger View Post
Here we go again with the defense, you know now it's just like "whatever, ignore it" honestly it is. Hopefully Staal plays some games with us this year, and I'd so love for us to win the cup not only so I can party my ass off and die in peace (even though I'm young and have good chances at seeing more cups from our Rangers) but just for the meer fact of shoving it in these "no blue-line, non contender" faces of these "NHL experts".
^^ agreed

The Perfect Paradox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-06-2007, 09:01 PM
  #4
Levitate
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 21,693
vCash: 500
Eh, we should be used to it by now, and there is a legit point in there. The Rangers defense is not that dynamic, and has no big names...but that doesn't mean it's weak and is/will be their downfall.

Honestly, if Rozsival can put together a consistent season, I might actually consider him a legit top pairing defenseman, and everyone else is solid, if unspectacular at what they do. Having another top tier guy in there could definitely help, but I basically feel like the players the Rangers have on D right now aren't going to be what makes or breaks this team. The Rangers didn't have such great GA totals over the second half of the season *just* because of Lundqvist (though he was obviously a big factor).

Anyways, defense is just the easiest thing to point out about the Rangers. They don't have a big name back there and they don't have a true #1 guy, so everyone is always going to say that's their weakness.

Levitate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-06-2007, 09:09 PM
  #5
RMcDonagh
New York Rangers Cup
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 6,269
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Levitate View Post
Eh, we should be used to it by now, and there is a legit point in there. The Rangers defense is not that dynamic, and has no big names...but that doesn't mean it's weak and is/will be their downfall.

Honestly, if Rozsival can put together a consistent season, I might actually consider him a legit top pairing defenseman, and everyone else is solid, if unspectacular at what they do. Having another top tier guy in there could definitely help, but I basically feel like the players the Rangers have on D right now aren't going to be what makes or breaks this team. The Rangers didn't have such great GA totals over the second half of the season *just* because of Lundqvist (though he was obviously a big factor).

Anyways, defense is just the easiest thing to point out about the Rangers. They don't have a big name back there and they don't have a true #1 guy, so everyone is always going to say that's their weakness.
If Staal comes up and plays great and is a top tier conditioned and all that and puts up rookie top points then will they still say no big names?

RMcDonagh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-06-2007, 09:28 PM
  #6
Levitate
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 21,693
vCash: 500
Yes, they'll say no big names until Marc Staal proves that he is a big name in the NHL.

Levitate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-07-2007, 01:28 AM
  #7
Brooklyn Ranger
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Brooklyn, of course
Posts: 8,550
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruno Ranger View Post
If Staal comes up and plays great and is a top tier conditioned and all that and puts up rookie top points then will they still say no big names?
It's possible, but no one can expect or assume it will actually happen. And certainly Sather isn't expecting it to happen--there's plenty of time between training camp and the trade deadline to find help if (and probably when) it's needed.

The defense is legitimate issue and will be around until there is either a trade which improves the defense or the Rangers win the Stanley Cup with the defensemen on the roster.

Brooklyn Ranger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-07-2007, 01:43 AM
  #8
Inferno
HFB Partner
 
Inferno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Country: United States
Posts: 21,123
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brooklyn Ranger View Post
It's possible, but no one can expect or assume it will actually happen. And certainly Sather isn't expecting it to happen--there's plenty of time between training camp and the trade deadline to find help if (and probably when) it's needed.

The defense is legitimate issue and will be around until there is either a trade which improves the defense or the Rangers win the Stanley Cup with the defensemen on the roster.
agreed. i think staal will be a #1, but to expect in his first season is crazy. im hoping he makes the team as a #6. if by the end of the year he is a true #3 or 4 id call it amazing progress.

Inferno is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
09-07-2007, 02:07 AM
  #9
Brooklyn Ranger
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Brooklyn, of course
Posts: 8,550
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by inferno272 View Post
agreed. i think staal will be a #1, but to expect in his first season is crazy. im hoping he makes the team as a #6. if by the end of the year he is a true #3 or 4 id call it amazing progress.
The kid can't even drink and some people are expecting him to take over and be the savior before he's even played one game in the NHL. If he can make the team and provide steady defense for 80+ games as part of the 3rd pair, it will be a very successful debut. To assume anything more, especially for a team with such high expectations, is insane.

Brooklyn Ranger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-07-2007, 02:15 AM
  #10
Lundqvist=Vezina
Legendary
 
Lundqvist=Vezina's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: My world
Country: United States
Posts: 5,226
vCash: 529
Send a message via AIM to Lundqvist=Vezina
That's a solid preview, except for the point about the defense of course. A lot of people just like to ignore the facts.

Lundqvist=Vezina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-07-2007, 06:23 AM
  #11
RangerBoy
#freejtmiller
 
RangerBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: New York
Country: United States
Posts: 32,810
vCash: 500
TB and Carolina won championships with their defense.The closet thing to a top notch D man on those two teams was Dan Boyle.People will always find reasons to criticize.Which defenseman is going to make the Rangers a legitimate contender?The available players will be players past their primes who won't be able to make a major difference or some overpriced piece of garbage.At what price in terms of assets and cap dollars?

RangerBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-07-2007, 06:48 AM
  #12
Wheatking
Registered User
 
Wheatking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 15,370
vCash: 500
I'm not here to bash and I'll quickly admit that I don't know a ton about the Rangers past the absolutely huge news that makes headlines.

From what I can see, the Rangers defense isn't "strong". I'm here to tell you that although you have a great set of forwards, that's a bigger problem then you might think and I witnessed it last season with my Oilers. We had Torres coming off a 27 goal season, Lupul with 28, Smyth with 36, Horcoff with 22, Stoll had 22, Sykora had 23, Hemsky had 19 and Pisani had 18. All these guys with the exception of Sykora and Smyth were still young and only getting better. The media was saying we would score 300 goals. We certainly had the personel to do it but all our problems rooted from the back end. We ended up scoring fewer goals than any other team in the league. Why? Because there was no transition game.Our defensemen couldn't get the forwards the puck. There was never a goal that came on the fly. Instead quick skaters like Hemsky, Lupul and Torres would have to wait at the red line for a pass to come off the boards. They couldn't enter the zone with speed and it lead to us having a lot of trouble getting set up or just turning over the puck.

Based on the scouting reports I've read, the Rangers don't have a single Dman past maybe Rozsival that can move the puck. That could be wrong. You guys know more than I do. If this is the case then be prepared to not score as many goals as you'd have hoped. Luckly you have names like Jagr, Shanahan, Gomez and Drury up front. That's alot better than Smyth, Hemsky, Sykora and Torres so you might be able to fake it for a while. Just don't be surprised if your defense is exposed a couple months into the season.

Again, I'm not here to bash. I've actually always had a spot for the Rangers due to the amount of Oilers that were there in the early 90s. I'm just given you guys the heads up on a possible situation that I had to witness for 82 games last season.

Wheatking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-07-2007, 06:54 AM
  #13
Ola
Registered User
 
Ola's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sweden
Country: Sweden
Posts: 18,896
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by RangerBoy View Post
TB and Carolina won championships with their defense.The closet thing to a top notch D man on those two teams was Dan Boyle.People will always find reasons to criticize.Which defenseman is going to make the Rangers a legitimate contender?The available players will be players past their primes who won't be able to make a major difference or some overpriced piece of garbage.At what price in terms of assets and cap dollars?
I agree 100%. The blueline in the entire NHL is in a transition period. The conditions have changed; many defensemens who could have developed into really good D's in the "new" NHL never got a chance 10 years ago, or was moved to other positions -- like if you where 6'1 or shorter...

I wouldn't at all be suprised if the best D moved this season is on par with a Alex Zhitnik; there aren't better guys out there developed. Guys like Norström among others just isn't a big addition, he wil never put anyone over the top, and they got a really hefty price tag. So many of the big names in the old NHL have taken a step backwards, like Special Ed.

There are a few guys, like Neids, Pronger, Lidas and Kaberle who deserves to be called franchise D's. After them is the guys who never will get moved; like Phaneuf, Campbell, Weber and Redden among others. What left after that just don't intrigue me, they would come with a extremely high price, both to get them and with a huge hit to the salary cap; and wouldn't put us over the top.

Like, for example, McCabe would be a upgrade over Mara, but a marginal one, and he would probably cost us atleast one 1st & 2nd rounder, along with atleast a good prospect like Korpikoski and maybe even a roster player like Prucha. On top of it all he got a 6 m cap hit.

So I don't see what Slats realistically could do. Unless he could swing a deal like Prucha/Callahan and Mara for a Seabrook or something like that...

Ola is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-07-2007, 09:51 AM
  #14
Levitate
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 21,693
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wheatking View Post
I
Based on the scouting reports I've read, the Rangers don't have a single Dman past maybe Rozsival that can move the puck. That could be wrong.
Couple of things. The defense is mainly the same as it was last year, and the year before. And in those years, the Rangers offense did just fine for the most part, with the real culprit being a lack of a legit 2nd line center to help spread the offense out.

Next, almost every defenseman the Rangers have can transition the puck well. Malik actually is one of the better outlet passers on the team (except for occasional brain farts that he gets lambasted for...they're not that common though). Tyutin as well is quite good at passing or skating the puck out of the zone. Girardi proved he is solid and calm and moving the puck, and Mara is decent at it as well.

The "problem" with the Rangers D at this moment is that it doesn't have any extremes. There isn't a guy who's really great on offense, and there isn't a guy who's super shutdown defenseman of the league. Most of the D are good at both, but relatively unspectacular.

Basically, the transition out of the zone should be fine, as it's worked for the past several years.

Levitate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-07-2007, 10:39 AM
  #15
Sad London Ranger
RIP Boogie
 
Sad London Ranger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: london england
Posts: 2,455
vCash: 500
Send a message via Yahoo to Sad London Ranger
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lundqvist=Vezina View Post
That's a solid preview, except for the point about the defense of course. A lot of people just like to ignore the facts.
i think the preview is spot on. our D is not inflicting fear into anyone, thats a fact.
Whether Marc Staal is going to scare the bejxsus out of Isles and Deb forwards remains to be seen. An upgrade is in the offing....there might be some sacrifices made by trade deadline..

Sad London Ranger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-07-2007, 11:09 AM
  #16
Pizza
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,588
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wheatking View Post
I'm not here to bash and I'll quickly admit that I don't know a ton about the Rangers past the absolutely huge news that makes headlines.

From what I can see, the Rangers defense isn't "strong". I'm here to tell you that although you have a great set of forwards, that's a bigger problem then you might think and I witnessed it last season with my Oilers. We had Torres coming off a 27 goal season, Lupul with 28, Smyth with 36, Horcoff with 22, Stoll had 22, Sykora had 23, Hemsky had 19 and Pisani had 18. All these guys with the exception of Sykora and Smyth were still young and only getting better. The media was saying we would score 300 goals. We certainly had the personel to do it but all our problems rooted from the back end. We ended up scoring fewer goals than any other team in the league. Why? Because there was no transition game.Our defensemen couldn't get the forwards the puck. There was never a goal that came on the fly. Instead quick skaters like Hemsky, Lupul and Torres would have to wait at the red line for a pass to come off the boards. They couldn't enter the zone with speed and it lead to us having a lot of trouble getting set up or just turning over the puck.

Based on the scouting reports I've read, the Rangers don't have a single Dman past maybe Rozsival that can move the puck. That could be wrong. You guys know more than I do. If this is the case then be prepared to not score as many goals as you'd have hoped. Luckly you have names like Jagr, Shanahan, Gomez and Drury up front. That's alot better than Smyth, Hemsky, Sykora and Torres so you might be able to fake it for a while. Just don't be surprised if your defense is exposed a couple months into the season.

Again, I'm not here to bash. I've actually always had a spot for the Rangers due to the amount of Oilers that were there in the early 90s. I'm just given you guys the heads up on a possible situation that I had to witness for 82 games last season.

This seems to be the perception of our blue line in general. I'm not a stat maven, but I think our goals against percentage was pretty decent. In terms of moving the puck well or making the good out let pass, I think we're a little under rated in this area. That gives us a chance to pull some surprises. Renney and his staff are pretty good at that. If the D stands up the way it did last year, we'll be fine.

Pizza is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-07-2007, 01:09 PM
  #17
Inferno
HFB Partner
 
Inferno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Country: United States
Posts: 21,123
vCash: 500
the rangers outlet passes have to be from their own zone...to 3 feet away. if the rangers forwards dont skate back and play D, we get killed. its as simple as that. and if they are playing D, transitioning the puck to them is much easier.

Inferno is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
09-07-2007, 01:39 PM
  #18
RangerBoy
#freejtmiller
 
RangerBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: New York
Country: United States
Posts: 32,810
vCash: 500
It wasn't that long ago(at least to me)that hockey experts were claiming the Rangers couldn't win with their blueline.91-92/92-93/93-94.The team did win two President's trophies and a Cup in those three seasons.The media was pounding the table about the Rangers needing to go get Dave Manson out of Edmonton.He was the missing piece to the Rangers puzzle.Instead of making the big deal and meeting Sather's ranson demand for Manson,the Rangers traded for Kevin Lowe(Roman Oksiuta and a 3rd round pick)and allowed Sergei Zubov to develop.Zubov made James Patrick expendable.Of course,they had a young Brian Leetch.Plus Jeff Beukeboom(Messier deal).Neil Smith made an excellent deal with Quebec-Mike Hurlbut for Alexander Karpovtsev

RangerBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:03 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2015 All Rights Reserved.