The point would be that he feels the trophy is worthless to bring up since he didn't deserve it.
Speaking of worthless things to bring up, you've got that area covered, it seems.
Which is your opinion, and not a statement of fact. In your, let me emphasize this again, OPINION, Iginla deserved the Hart more than Theodore. That's debateable, but it's certainly not a fact. And another thing, what makes your opinion more valid than the professional hockey writers that, *gasp*, actually voted on the award? What are your credentials, anyway? Oh, my mistake! You post at an internet message board! Clearly what you say holds more water than what anyone else does, including the paid professionals. How stupid of me to even think otherwise!