HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > The History of Hockey
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

The History of Hockey Relive great moments in hockey history and discuss how the game has changed over time.

Patrick Roy- could he have played one more year?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
04-20-2017, 03:49 AM
  #1
ChrisK97
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,470
vCash: 500
Patrick Roy- could he have played one more year?

Looking back in retrospect, I honestly was very surprised when Roy announced his retirement after 2002-03.

He was only one year removed from probably his best season in Colorado- and with all due respect to Iginla/Theodore, he would have gotten my votes for the Hart and Vezina.


That 2002-03 season was not exactly a big dip from the prior year:

35-15-13, 2.18 GAA, .920 save percentage

Was an All-Star: heck, he won the goaltenders competition of All-Star Saturday

Led Colorado on a major post-Christmas tear to steal the division title from Vancouver

If anything, I would have thought that after blowing that 3-1 series lead and the OT losses to Minnesota, Roy would have wanted to redeem himself given how fiercely competitive he was as a goalie.

He was 37, but that wasn't exactly ancient by goalie standards- remember, Belfour was only one year younger that season and he had a Vezina caliber season (and he had a fine year at the age of 37 himself).

And also remember Brodeur's last playoff hurrah was at the age of 40. Heck, even one of his felllw goalie GOAT's Hasek was still able to goaltend well. Heck, he was 39 going on 40 when he was with Ottawa for that one season.

Considering the impending 2004 lockout doomsday and the all-in feel that season had, could you have seen Roy going all out for one last Cup hurrah with the Kariya-Selanne all-in gamble before calling it quits?

ChrisK97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-20-2017, 04:11 AM
  #2
Michael Whiteacre
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 113
vCash: 500
I say Patrick Roy would've helped carry Paul Kariya and Teemu Selanne to a Cup, instead of having to put David Aebischer out there as Colorado's top goalie when Roy retired at the conclusion of '02-'03.

Kariya did okay for Colorado despite being injury prone, but Selanne proved to be a disappointment because he's only good for offense, which Colorado didn't allow him to be an offensive-minded guy on ice like Winnipeg and Anaheim allowed him to be in his early career. Put the defensive gameplay shackles on Selanne, and you'll create a potential troublemaker in him because he won't care to play defense.

Having Patrick Roy carry the talented Finnish winger to a Cup would have done wonders, but Selanne eventually won a Cup in '06-'07 with Anaheim as a rejuvenated RW who finally got his chronic knee problems sorted out by the time the lockout ended in 2005. Selanne was never right for Colorado with his chronic knee pains, and Tony Granato could've shied away from Selanne but went through with signing Paul Kariya.

Kariya wasn't that bad in Colorado, everyone.

Michael Whiteacre is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-20-2017, 08:06 AM
  #3
quoipourquoi
Moderator
Goaltender
 
quoipourquoi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hockeytown, MI
Country: United States
Posts: 6,092
vCash: 500
He was hurting pretty badly at that point, so unless Colorado was defending a Stanley Cup championship from 2003, there wasn't much incentive to return for 2004. I don't know that he makes a difference in that San Jose matchup anyway. But he could still go (22-4-4, .939 in his final 30 games to take the division title). It may have been detrimental to his quality of life after hockey to do so, and by his own admission, he could tell it was the end during the Minnesota series.

quoipourquoi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-20-2017, 08:34 AM
  #4
Bonzai12
Registered User
 
Bonzai12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Denver CO
Country: United States
Posts: 10,338
vCash: 500
Send a message via Yahoo to Bonzai12
I remember when he retired that I thought it was time for him to hang em up

His play had been declining somewhat - it was noticeable.

We watch so many guys that hang on for years and years to break records or collect more money or whatever. I actually give hats off to Roy that he went out with dignity. A lot of athletes don't, so it's hard to criticize guys who decide to leave the game before taking their last gasp of athletic livelihood. I didn't want to watch him play until 40 or until he was 25% of the goalie he once was.

Bonzai12 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-20-2017, 08:40 AM
  #5
The Panther
Registered User
 
The Panther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Country: Japan
Posts: 4,895
vCash: 500
I was kinda surprised when he retired then, too. Certainly he could still deliver the mail then.

Remember, though, that age 38 for a guy who had a bunch of deep playoff runs as the undisputed top guy (and Roy had had about eight by 2003) is more wearing than for guy who barely made the playoffs every year. Those eight deep runs are probably the equivalent of one or two extra seasons on Roy.


Off-topic, but has anyone read the bio of Roy? Despite the cheesy title, I was thinking about reading it until I saw that Roy's Dad wrote it.

The Panther is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-20-2017, 09:20 AM
  #6
quoipourquoi
Moderator
Goaltender
 
quoipourquoi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hockeytown, MI
Country: United States
Posts: 6,092
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Panther View Post
Off-topic, but has anyone read the bio of Roy? Despite the cheesy title, I was thinking about reading it until I saw that Roy's Dad wrote it.
I read the English version. My French isn't perfect, so I haven't tried Le Guerrier yet which is a much better title. It's pretty solid, and Michel made a point to focus more on media reports and interviews to tell the story of the on-ice performance and the insight as an immediate family member to dive into the off-ice portion.

Worth a read, for sure.

quoipourquoi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-20-2017, 09:28 AM
  #7
Jaromir Blogger
Registered User
 
Jaromir Blogger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 104
vCash: 500
I think he could have kept on going and made an impact. He was declining, but he still had some gas left in the tank. I think he just felt it was the right time to bow out, and to his credit, he did so before he became washed up.

Is there a good thread that does an in-depth examination of Colorado's decline in the 00's?

Jaromir Blogger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-20-2017, 02:55 PM
  #8
BraveCanadian
Registered User
 
BraveCanadian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,357
vCash: 500
Yeah I'm sure he could have if had wanted to... I think it was a little similar to Denis Potvin though in that he didn't want to be the veteran hoping a rebuild would happen in time to contend before he personally declined (which he already was starting to).

BraveCanadian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-20-2017, 07:42 PM
  #9
Sadekuuro
Registered User
 
Sadekuuro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 5,182
vCash: 500
He was still great in terms of performance, but his hips had been causing him problems for years and were getting worse. Hip trouble is apparently endemic to butterfly goaltending, and who played more games in that style than Roy?

Sadekuuro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-21-2017, 09:47 AM
  #10
vadim sharifijanov
ugh
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 14,415
vCash: 500
it's an interesting question, what could have been in '04. injuries are probably still injuries (to kariya and forsberg, and selanne is still hobbled), and i think we all know that there is no way roy would not come back to try to avenge giving up a 3-1 series lead to a lowly expansion team unless his body said no. if not for how the detroit series went the year prior (the embarrassing game 6 gaffe and then getting shelled in game 7), i doubt he even would have come back for the '03 season.

but as a thought experiment, the idea in '04 was the boys would handle themselves. they were all superstars, they all had been around for a while, except i guess tanguay and aebischer, four of them had been captains of other teams (and forsberg and foote were future captains), and so they hired a country club coach (granato) because i don't think lacroix thought the team needed a coach. of course it did, and granato was in way over his head. part of that i think is you lost a lot of veteran presence when bourque retired after '01, you lost keane, drury, guys like that, and it wasn't really as much of a veteran team as you'd think. and maybe roy would have been the one to take control of that room, put granato (and everyone else) in his place, and will that team to its potential. or maybe not, but aebischer was more than fine that year; the team didn't necessarily need an aging roy in the crease, at least not to the degree that it would have made a difference on the year. but they maybe did need him in the room and behind the scenes.

vadim sharifijanov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-21-2017, 10:17 AM
  #11
quoipourquoi
Moderator
Goaltender
 
quoipourquoi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hockeytown, MI
Country: United States
Posts: 6,092
vCash: 500
Good point, vadim. Lemieux, Deadmarsh, Bourque, Keane, and Roy - that's a lot of leadership heading in the wrong direction every season. ESPN isn't exactly HBO, but did their two-part series on the 2004 Colorado Avalanche give any indication that the team was lacking that element? Going down 0-3 to San Jose is probably uncharacteristic enough.

quoipourquoi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-22-2017, 04:54 AM
  #12
Jaromir Blogger
Registered User
 
Jaromir Blogger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 104
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by quoipourquoi View Post
Good point, vadim. Lemieux, Deadmarsh, Bourque, Keane, and Roy - that's a lot of leadership heading in the wrong direction every season.
Agreed 100%. Bourque and Roy (i.e. the big names) aside, I always got the impression that Mike Keane in particular was one of the most important leaders on that squad. He just seemed to bring a little extra glue to the room, or whatever you want to call it. His inclusion in the Roy deal always struck me as one of the most underrated strokes of genius in Lacroix's heyday dealings. I think Keane was a not-insignificant part of what put the Avs over the top in 96.

And agreed re: everyone else you mentioned.

Jaromir Blogger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-22-2017, 10:31 AM
  #13
tony d
Kyle Turris
 
tony d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Behind A Tree
Country: Canada
Posts: 55,952
vCash: 500
It was an awful way for Roy to go out though. Got to think that 2004 Avs team with Roy in net could have done a bit more damage had he been there.

__________________
tony d is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:41 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2017 All Rights Reserved.