HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > National Hockey League Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
National Hockey League Talk Discuss NHL players, teams, games, and the Stanley Cup Playoffs.

I want to see the NHL adopt Shoot-outs

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
05-11-2004, 12:37 PM
  #26
Rscorpio
Epic Meal Time!
 
Rscorpio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Santiago, Chile
Country: Chile
Posts: 2,833
vCash: 500
Quote:
No shoot-out. Hockey is a teamsport and shoot-out turns it into sport of individuals.
******** IMO .


What about ''Football'' (soccer) , they have a shoot-out at the end if the game is tie.

and...


Soccer is THE TEAMSPORT

Rscorpio is offline  
Old
05-11-2004, 12:40 PM
  #27
Karl Pilkington
Registered User
 
Karl Pilkington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ottawa
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,980
vCash: 500
Exiciting for the fans... annoying to the players... Shootouts are good once and a while (ie: olympics etc).. so lets just keep them there. You can't tell me you guys don't find 4 on 4 OT exciting...

Karl Pilkington is offline  
Old
05-11-2004, 02:12 PM
  #28
InstantFunk
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 132
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by bb_fan
-who cares about sports center shoot out number 1200 highlights?
For all the complaining about how hard it is for Hockey as a sport to present itself to new viewers, this would almost seem like a no-brainer for me. What better way to get more people to watch hockey than to provide great highlights?

I'm still up in the air over the shootout issue, but I think you're being a bit hasty with this particular reason. Bottom line is that the NHL needs more viewers. Make it easier for Sportscenter to show hockey highlights and they will put more hockey on Sportscenter. Pique the interest of a few people and, next thing you know, more people are watching the games themselves.

I agree with posters who have said that the shootouts themselves would get old after a short time. On the other hand, there's bound to be some players in the league that can generate some amazing stuff if given the chance multiple times during the season.

InstantFunk is offline  
Old
05-11-2004, 02:24 PM
  #29
bleedgreen
Moderator
 
bleedgreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: colorado
Posts: 10,803
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoseTheo
Exiciting for the fans... annoying to the players... Shootouts are good once and a while (ie: olympics etc).. so lets just keep them there. You can't tell me you guys don't find 4 on 4 OT exciting...
i agree 100% with 4 on 4 being exciting. i watch games on center ice i might normally turn off if its close just to watch 4 on 4. i saw some crazy overtimes this season, which kept my interest up long after my team was no longer involved in the playoff hunt. i agree with traditionalists against shootouts - but i think it may be inevitable. there is no doubt it would attract fans, the only people turned off would be more die hard fans who are going to keep watching anyway. its not like teams really sit on the tie during 4 on 4 - the more they get used to it the more games will end prior to shootout. i also think the players will go more all out in an effort to avoid the shootout.

bleedgreen is offline  
Old
05-11-2004, 02:26 PM
  #30
Hellsempire
Registered User
 
Hellsempire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: The Rock Section 233
Country: United States
Posts: 2,483
vCash: 500
Shootouts would most definitely excite the game and it would get rid of the ties which are just worthless. Neither have a shootout or make the overtime period another 20 minute period. If there is no score by then, a tie would be granted.

Hellsempire is offline  
Old
05-11-2004, 03:04 PM
  #31
txpd
Registered User
 
txpd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 41,447
vCash: 500
It would be more fun to watch an NCAA football OT style power play shootout rather than a shootout.

I am not sure how you do it. but that is at least team. not one on one.

txpd is online now  
Old
05-11-2004, 03:07 PM
  #32
BCCHL inactive
 
Join Date: May 2002
Country:
Posts: 10,561
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rscorpio
******** IMO .


What about ''Football'' (soccer) , they have a shoot-out at the end if the game is tie.

and...


Soccer is THE TEAMSPORT
1. Soccer has always been this way. They tried the golden goal (FIFA term for sudden death) in their extra time...fans were outraged. They hated it. Then FIFA went to a "Silver Goal", meaning if a team scores in the first extra half and holds it until the end of the half, the game is over.....now there are rumours that FIFA will go back to the traditional playing of 30 minutes of extra time no matter what..........and with this all, there has still been a penalty shootout after 30 minutes of extra time.

2. A soccer field is huge. We're lucky enough as it is to see three goals in a match. If soccer were to go continuous sudden death, games could realistically last all night (literally). That would put the players at risk for injury due to extreme exhaustion as they are moving the whole game, and unlike hockey, they get no breaks. There is no changing on the fly, teams are allowed three subs all game long.


Long story short, continuous OT would be too hard on soccer players, and shootouts are their tradition. Shootouts have never been part of hockey tradition.

BCCHL inactive is offline  
Old
05-11-2004, 04:01 PM
  #33
AGraveOne
Registered User
 
AGraveOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 2,138
vCash: 500
Send a message via Yahoo to AGraveOne
Quote:
Originally Posted by txpd
It would be more fun to watch an NCAA football OT style power play shootout rather than a shootout.

I am not sure how you do it. but that is at least team. not one on one.
i think that would be more exciting than shootouts...

give each team a powerplay until one scores and the other doesn't. (of course these goals shouldn't count for a player's stats....could get ridiculous.)

AGraveOne is offline  
Old
05-11-2004, 07:49 PM
  #34
Anksun
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Montreal
Posts: 3,565
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to Anksun
Shootouts in the regular season, i'm fine with this. Would certainly help on the US market by bringing some more highlights.

Of course, this have nothing to do with Playoffs which would prevent teams to focuss on the shootout to win games since the playoffs are really what matters.

Anksun is offline  
Old
05-11-2004, 10:51 PM
  #35
Til the End of Time
Registered User
 
Til the End of Time's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Buenos Aires
Posts: 7,114
vCash: 500
Like others have said, I never want to see a shoot-out in the playoffs.

But I'm not sure if the NHL should adopt them in the regular season. I think they should first try it in the AHL, like they did with the red line thing this year. If people like it and it works, then consider bringing it up to the NHL.

But not until then.

Til the End of Time is offline  
Old
05-12-2004, 12:48 AM
  #36
Prince Mercury
Registered User
 
Prince Mercury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Fort McMurray
Country: Canada
Posts: 761
vCash: 500
I think shoot-outs should be optional on interference penalties. There are some dumb plays made to take away fair scoring chances and I think this would not only add excitement to the game, but take crap like players sitting in the net out of the game.

Hopefully.

Prince Mercury is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:03 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.