HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > New York Rangers
Notices

Top End Talent

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
05-14-2008, 10:07 PM
  #1
ruckus*
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Jersey
Country: United States
Posts: 3,554
vCash: 500
Top End Talent

Where is ours? I've been thinking about this because it's a prospect board and all and everyone on here is always all about getting rid of (veteran) to insert (prospect) for whatever reason. And there's always a lot of talk and disagreement about players and what they project to be. But my question is about TOP END talent. I'm talking about first and second liners. Now who knows when Cherepanov is going to be here. I'm not going to sit here and say I know anything about our prospects than stuff that I've read on here because this is where I get my information. But other than Cherry do we have a top six forward in our system? People will argue Dawes is one. And while I do like Dawes, the guy turned INVISIBLE far too many times for me. I think Dawes is a solid third liner who at his peak is a second liner. Cally is a hustle player. And all these other forwards we seem to have in our systme appear to be 3rd and 4th liners. Without Jagr, Straka, Shanny, and potentially Avery next year (I'd assume at least two of the four will be gone) where are we going? Everyone throws Hossa into these projected lineups for next year as if it's a given. Ryder and Rolston do nothing for me. This team almost has to re-sign Jagr. Our D prospects I've read are good but even someone like Sanguinetti is still a defensemen. Someone enlighten me.

ruckus* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-14-2008, 10:21 PM
  #2
Trxjw
Moderator
Bored.
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Land of no calls..
Country: United States
Posts: 15,803
vCash: 500
Dubi is looking like he could be a 2nd line center. Anisimov is probably your best bet to find top two line talent after Dubi. We have a lot of guys in our system who were projected to be great players, but are struggling to live up to expectations.

Trxjw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-14-2008, 10:32 PM
  #3
ruckus*
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Jersey
Country: United States
Posts: 3,554
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trxjw View Post
Dubi is looking like he could be a 2nd line center. Anisimov is probably your best bet to find top two line talent after Dubi. We have a lot of guys in our system who were projected to be great players, but are struggling to live up to expectations.

It's frustrating because I feel like a lot of the kids that have come up (Dubinsky, Dawes, Cally) are really great players to have on a team, but only Dubi to me can be considered top 6. I think Dawes is a reach for the top 6. Staal is a stud on defense but I'm really thinking about forwards. Everything I've heard about our D prospects we should have a stellar backline in a few years.

I'm glad we are producing players that can contribute at the NHL level, but you need studs to win championships. Once our old ones leave, we've got nothing.

ruckus* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-14-2008, 10:36 PM
  #4
jBuds
pretty damn valuable
 
jBuds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NYC Suburbs
Country: Lord Howe Island
Posts: 26,461
vCash: 500
Not every team has that one stud prospect in its system. Look at Detroit - hell, they make a living of Stanley Cups on proper drafting in the later rounds... they don't have any of those top-end studs. Only the teams picking high annually seem to have those, yet they still end up with high picks yearly.

Gomez is young enough, Dubinsky had a coming-out party this year, Staal is a stud with #1 potential and already making an impact as a 21 year old (and only going to improve with experience). I'd say your situation is no different than most.

jBuds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-14-2008, 11:03 PM
  #5
Draft Guru
The Wizard of Özil
 
Draft Guru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Long Island
Country: United States
Posts: 6,569
vCash: 500
Which teams have top end talent waiting in the wings? And of those teams, which have not finished in the bottom of the league consistently the last few years? Fact is you're not going to get top-end prospects unless you finish close to dead last and get a pick in the top 5. Surely we have missed the boat on some draft picks in the last decade, but our cupboard is the best it has been in probably 12-15 years. And we have made the playoffs 3 years running. It's difficult to ice a competitive team and be in position to draft 1st line players at the same time.

And how exactly do you define top-end talent? I think most teams would love to have a group of youngsters that would include the likes of Staal, Dubinsky, Cherepanov, Anisimov, Dawes, Sanguinetti, etc. While neither is a bonafide star, all IMO have the potential to be top 6 forwards or in Staal's case a top pairing defenseman.

Draft Guru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-14-2008, 11:18 PM
  #6
DarthSather99
Registered User
 
DarthSather99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NYC
Country: United States
Posts: 3,245
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trxjw View Post
Dubi is looking like he could be a 2nd line center. Anisimov is probably your best bet to find top two line talent after Dubi. We have a lot of guys in our system who were projected to be great players, but are struggling to live up to expectations.
I don't think many have been marked to be GREAT. The problem is that TOP END talent is usually found within the top 10 of any draft. Many of the top young players in the league now have been top 5. When we were bad we were never bad enough to get a shot at those type of players.

Teams like Pittsburgh have been accumulating picks like that for most of a decade.

Unfortunately we have had to rely on finding diamonds in the rough which often are players with talent but need more time to find their game. These players will hit their stride in their mid 20's, not late teens/early 20's.

The players you mentioned come to mind. As far as TOP END talent, I'd put Lundqvist and Staal up there. Early in our rebuilding we focused most of our top picks on defense. Remember with Staal he was projected to be a top 5 pick but mysteriously slipped. We got VERY LUCKY. Cherepanov and Anisimov slipped because of potential problems with Russian transfer agreements.

DarthSather99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-14-2008, 11:32 PM
  #7
Carlos Ranger
Zucc-a-Rella
 
Carlos Ranger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 5,091
vCash: 67
Yes we need to consistently draft better, and maybe find that diamond in the rough player that Detroit has several of..

but, between Lundqvist, Staal, Dubinsky, and a couple of other prospects I think we'll be ok. Not going to be able to draft a superstar forward every few years.

Carlos Ranger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-15-2008, 12:19 AM
  #8
NYR Viper
Moderator
 
NYR Viper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: PA
Country: United States
Posts: 27,322
vCash: 500
bourret, sauer, hillier, hagelin i think are all oing to be pretty good players, at least fringe second liners and in sauers case a second pairing guy

NYR Viper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-15-2008, 12:22 AM
  #9
Anthony Mauro
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Anthony Mauro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,289
vCash: 500
Hillier baby

__________________
Click for LIVE updates on US vs. SVK on 4/24/14 starting 6AM EST
Anthony Mauro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-15-2008, 02:58 AM
  #10
Cherepanov 71
Registered User
 
Cherepanov 71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Albany, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 921
vCash: 500
The problem s we dont have a legitimate first line forward in the system. Cherepanov is borderline, he could be greate or good or average. The problem is the more you are a average to good hockey team the less your chance is to draft a great prospect.

Cherepanov 71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-15-2008, 07:55 AM
  #11
SupersonicMonkey*
DROP THE PUCK
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Country: United States
Posts: 15,193
vCash: 500
Dubinsky, Cherepanov, Anisimov are all top 6 forwards in the making.

You don't need to have all top 6 forwards developed from within.

Gomez, Drury, Dubinsky, Cherepanov, Anisimov

Thats 5 right there... although most are centers. Which is why i feel we gotta draft another top end winger. Further: Drury can play wing, as he has before in Colorado.

Go out and sign someone like Hossa or Kovalchuk, or whom ever in the next couple of years and that can contend with the likes of the Penguins and Red Wings.

I know where you are coming from, because most of our prospects are projected 3rd or 4th line players. But that is not so terrible, as the lower lines need to be cheaper, and as far as i know most franchises in the NHL are in the same position unless they have had multiple top 5 picks for a few years... like the Penguins.

SupersonicMonkey* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-15-2008, 07:56 AM
  #12
SupersonicMonkey*
DROP THE PUCK
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Country: United States
Posts: 15,193
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manhattan Blue View Post
Hillier baby
I like Hillier a lot.

He has the talent to be a top 6 forward.

He needs to realize his potential and blossom.

SupersonicMonkey* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-15-2008, 08:19 AM
  #13
chosen
Registered User
 
chosen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,066
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Draft Guru View Post
Fact is you're not going to get top-end prospects unless you finish close to dead last and get a pick in the top 5.
I disagree because we define top-end prospects differently. Where they are drafted is wholly irrelevant to me. Where they end up determines the reality of whether or not they are top-end talent.

Sure we won't get the Malkins and Crosbys unless we are picking 1st or 2nd but Detroit keeps uncovering top-end prospects despite usually drafting after the Rangers.

Who was the last top-end forward the Rangers drafted? It's staggeringly embarrassing.

chosen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-15-2008, 08:25 AM
  #14
Rags225
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Queens, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 5,371
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by chosen View Post
I disagree because we define top-end prospects differently. Where they are drafted is wholly irrelevant to me. Where they end up determines the reality of whether or not they are top-end talent.

Sure we won't get the Malkins and Crosbys unless we are picking 1st or 2nd but Detroit keeps uncovering top-end prospects despite usually drafting after the Rangers.

Who was the last top-end forward the Rangers drafted? It's staggeringly embarrassing.
Kovalev and Amonte I would say.

Rags225 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-15-2008, 08:27 AM
  #15
SingnBluesOnBroadway
Retired
 
SingnBluesOnBroadway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NYC
Country: United States
Posts: 29,360
vCash: 500
Awards:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Draft Guru View Post
Fact is you're not going to get top-end prospects unless you finish close to dead last and get a pick in the top 5.
And even still this team's first-line center, #1 defenseman and #1 goalie all came from the draft.

__________________
SingnBluesOnBroadway is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-15-2008, 12:06 PM
  #16
DarthSather99
Registered User
 
DarthSather99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NYC
Country: United States
Posts: 3,245
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by chosen View Post
I disagree because we define top-end prospects differently. Where they are drafted is wholly irrelevant to me. Where they end up determines the reality of whether or not they are top-end talent.

Sure we won't get the Malkins and Crosbys unless we are picking 1st or 2nd but Detroit keeps uncovering top-end prospects despite usually drafting after the Rangers.

Who was the last top-end forward the Rangers drafted? It's staggeringly embarrassing.
Sure Detroit does uncover some late round gems but besides them who uncovers more late round gems than the Rangers? not many.

To be fair also the Ranger organization didn't start taking the draft and player development seriously until 2003.


Last edited by DarthSather99: 05-15-2008 at 12:15 PM.
DarthSather99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-15-2008, 12:13 PM
  #17
Nich
Registered User
 
Nich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Long Beach, NY
Country: Croatia
Posts: 6,879
vCash: 500
imo, dubi and dawes are top 6...i think we'll see a hell of a season from dawes next year...my guess is he plays with gomez. his passing is so under rated.

callahan will be a 3rd liner unless his starts scoring like he did in the lower levels, which i just don't see...my guess is he tops oout at 25 goals a season

prucha is gone

staal is a top 2 dman in the making

tuts and girardi top out at 2nd pairing which is good.

bourett still has a chance at top 2 if he rebounds next year

ani imo can be a 1st line center if he continues to develop

korpedo is a 2nd/3rd liner.....

and cherry is a 1st liner if he puts on about 25-30 lbs of muscle.

Nich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-15-2008, 12:21 PM
  #18
chosen
Registered User
 
chosen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,066
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarthSather99 View Post
Sure Detroit does uncover some late round gems but besides them who uncovers more late round gems than the Rangers? not many.
Lundqvist and?

I'm sure there are some but I'm too lazy to look right now.

chosen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-15-2008, 12:26 PM
  #19
NYR Viper
Moderator
 
NYR Viper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: PA
Country: United States
Posts: 27,322
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by chosen View Post
Lundqvist and?

I'm sure there are some but I'm too lazy to look right now.
prucha, hagelin, girardi(undrafted), dawes

NYR Viper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-15-2008, 12:26 PM
  #20
SingnBluesOnBroadway
Retired
 
SingnBluesOnBroadway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NYC
Country: United States
Posts: 29,360
vCash: 500
Awards:
Quote:
Originally Posted by chosen View Post
Lundqvist and?

I'm sure there are some but I'm too lazy to look right now.
Prucha. Girardi was undrafted. Dawes in the 5th. Callahan in the 4th.

SingnBluesOnBroadway is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-15-2008, 12:28 PM
  #21
SingnBluesOnBroadway
Retired
 
SingnBluesOnBroadway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NYC
Country: United States
Posts: 29,360
vCash: 500
Awards:
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeyviper87 View Post
prucha, hagelin, girardi(undrafted), dawes
Let's wait until Hagelin plays for a game in North America before calling him a late round gem.

SingnBluesOnBroadway is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-15-2008, 12:30 PM
  #22
NYR Viper
Moderator
 
NYR Viper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: PA
Country: United States
Posts: 27,322
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SingnBluesOnBroadway View Post
Let's wait until Hagelin plays for a game in North America before calling him a late round gem.
isnt he playing at michigan?....i am really excited for him.....i like what i hear about him from everyone and it seems like he has great skills and is a good overall player who works hard

NYR Viper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-15-2008, 12:30 PM
  #23
Nich
Registered User
 
Nich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Long Beach, NY
Country: Croatia
Posts: 6,879
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeyviper87 View Post
isnt he playing at michigan?....i am really excited for him.....i like what i hear about him from everyone and it seems like he has great skills and is a good overall player who works hard
he is, but it is to early to tell...i expect him to blow up next season in scoring

Nich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-15-2008, 12:31 PM
  #24
SingnBluesOnBroadway
Retired
 
SingnBluesOnBroadway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NYC
Country: United States
Posts: 29,360
vCash: 500
Awards:
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeyviper87 View Post
isnt he playing at michigan?....i am really excited for him.....i like what i hear about him from everyone and it seems like he has great skills and is a good overall player who works hard
Then can we wait until he plays a professional game before labeling him?

SingnBluesOnBroadway is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-15-2008, 12:32 PM
  #25
squishy
Registered User
 
squishy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,149
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SingnBluesOnBroadway View Post
Let's wait until Hagelin plays for a game in North America before calling him a late round gem.
While I agree he has a long way to go before he can be called a late round gem, Hagelin played 41 games for one of the premier college programs in North America this season.

squishy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:23 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.