HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > New York Rangers
Notices

Rangers tied for 4th in Revenue

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
05-30-2008, 09:37 PM
  #1
Burlington Bomb 26
Louie Louie Oh oh
 
Burlington Bomb 26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Green Mountain State
Country: United States
Posts: 16,615
vCash: 500
Rangers tied for 4th in Revenue

The Rangers were the only American team in the top 5 for NHL's Revenue

1st-Toronto
2nd-Montreal
3rd-Vancouver
4th-New York Rangers, Calgary Flames
5th- Edmonton Oilers, Ottawa Senators


Maybe New York is the true Hockeytown, USA

http://www3.thestar.com/static/PDF/0...ts_revenue.pdf

Burlington Bomb 26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-30-2008, 09:54 PM
  #2
NYR Viper
Moderator
 
NYR Viper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: PA
Country: United States
Posts: 28,191
vCash: 500
no doubt.....although i think hockey in the US has been picking up in the past few years in a bunch of cities like:

washington
buffalo
pittsburg
san jose
minnesota

and that list already includes
new york
colorado
detroit
boston
philadelphia


and in the near future i see a few more cities as getting into hockey(or back into):
chicago
st. louis
nashville
tampa bay


i think for all people say that hockey is a canadian sport, it is becoming more and more popular in the US.....THANK GOD(or whoever you believe in)

NYR Viper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-30-2008, 09:56 PM
  #3
Jaromir Jagr
New York Rangers Cup
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 6,263
vCash: 500
Hockey is a Canadian sport, yes. But it's not surprising were in the top 5 at all. I really see Chicago as being "one of those teams" within the next few years. They got a lot of young talent. I think they'll be the Chicago they were back in the day soon enough (give or take 3-4 years).

Jaromir Jagr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-30-2008, 09:59 PM
  #4
rickyrod
Registered User
 
rickyrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: nyc
Country: United States
Posts: 1,294
vCash: 500
I don't know where we were last year, but most of the teams on this list changed their jersey style and probably sold way more than us, since we stayed the same. I'm sure that has something to do with it, especially in Vancouver's case. They love that eyesore of a jersey over there.

rickyrod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-30-2008, 10:01 PM
  #5
beastly115
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 10,424
vCash: 500
All the more reason to have the Winter Classic game at Yankee stadium.

beastly115 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-30-2008, 10:03 PM
  #6
BlueBlooded
Registered User
 
BlueBlooded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 1,075
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to BlueBlooded
Quote:
Originally Posted by alphaqup View Post
All the more reason to have the Winter Classic game at Yankee stadium.
Ranger's revenue > Detroit's revenue
Islander's revenue > Chicago's revenue



p.s. I know the stats are skewed based on ticket prices and number of seats so I don't want anybody to crucify me about this. Just wanted to point it out.

BlueBlooded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-30-2008, 10:35 PM
  #7
squishy
Registered User
 
squishy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,149
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickyrod View Post
I don't know where we were last year, but most of the teams on this list changed their jersey style and probably sold way more than us, since we stayed the same. I'm sure that has something to do with it, especially in Vancouver's case. They love that eyesore of a jersey over there.
The numbers being discussed/referenced in the article are for ticket revenue only, merchandise isn't included.

squishy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-30-2008, 11:14 PM
  #8
BlueShirts88
Section 208 Row 15
 
BlueShirts88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 10,335
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to BlueShirts88
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueBlooded View Post
Islander's revenue > Chicago's revenue.
That cant be true, can it? Chicago is an original 6 team.

__________________
"Matteau! Matteau! Matteau!"~H. Rose
BlueShirts88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-30-2008, 11:33 PM
  #9
bobbop
Henrik's Pop
 
bobbop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Suburban Phoenix
Country: United States
Posts: 4,822
vCash: 500
I understand this. I bought a ticket in Toronto for a game this year 11 rows off the ice in the corner with a $200 face value. (Fortunately I only paid the scalper $100) Amazing what they can charge for a regular season game.

bobbop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-30-2008, 11:47 PM
  #10
NYReign
Registered User
 
NYReign's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New York, New York
Country: United States
Posts: 896
vCash: 500
I know ESPN isn't the best source when it comes to hockey but in their box scores they provide percentage of attendance and when I take the time to look all the Canadian teams are almost always above 100% capacity. Since MSG as far as I know does not sell standing room, this is even more impressive and I don't think we have the highest capacity in the league (though I could be wrong). It shows how many fans we have and how many of them are loyal since we had to be close to selling out every game based on these numbers.

NYReign is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-31-2008, 01:20 AM
  #11
The Thomas J.*
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Staten Island, NY
Posts: 18,847
vCash: 500
What stuns me is Calgary being so high on that list, those guys were always claiming poverty & lossing money, & we are tied with them & considered among the leauges richest. Somthing doesn't make sense.

The Thomas J.* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-31-2008, 09:56 AM
  #12
SupersonicMonkey*
DROP THE PUCK
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Country: United States
Posts: 15,193
vCash: 500
Nobody mentions Minnesota, who has sold out every game of every year since their inception in 2000.

Minnesota is the biggest hockey town in the United States. Easily.

We have the largest market for one singular team, but as far as hockey as a sport, that goes to Minnesota.

SupersonicMonkey* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-31-2008, 10:18 AM
  #13
nyrmessier011
Registered User
 
nyrmessier011's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Charlotte/NYC
Country: United States
Posts: 3,347
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to nyrmessier011
Quote:
Originally Posted by BubblegumGang184434 View Post
The Rangers were the only American team in the top 5 for NHL's Revenue

1st-Toronto
2nd-Montreal
3rd-Vancouver
4th-New York Rangers, Calgary Flames
5th- Edmonton Oilers, Ottawa Senators


Maybe New York is the true Hockeytown, USA

http://www3.thestar.com/static/PDF/0...ts_revenue.pdf
We're on the smaller end of most arena capacities too. This isn't something to really be proud of, it's a joke what the ticket prices have become. That 18.2% is purely increases in ticket prices because our attendance is identical from last year. This basically tripled already ridiculous inflation figures for the past year. We're all getting robbed every year by Jimmy.

nyrmessier011 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-31-2008, 10:32 AM
  #14
n_a_c
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 372
vCash: 500
That document says "ticket revenue". So it wouldn't include revenue from jerseys or TV. It probably doesn't include revenue from food & drink sold at the games. I bet the order would be somewhat different once you include everything into the mix.

It doesn't suprise me that Canadian teams rule in terms of ticket revenue, especially since the Canadian and US dollar are virtually equal now.

As to the Islanders beating Chicago, looks like Chicago is trending up and will surpass the fishsticks next year. But I wonder what percentage of the ticket revenue is from Ranger fans at the the 4 Ranger games played there.

n_a_c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-31-2008, 11:05 AM
  #15
Ola
Registered User
 
Ola's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sweden
Country: Sweden
Posts: 17,457
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by n_a_c View Post
especially since the Canadian and US dollar are virtually equal now.
Compared to the Swedish Krona the USD is down with 50% compared to the all time high that was like 7-8 years ago. And probably like 30% the last year only.

That of course got a major impact on numbers like this...

Ola is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-31-2008, 11:07 AM
  #16
broadwayblue
Registered User
 
broadwayblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NYC
Country: United States
Posts: 15,635
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by nyrmessier011 View Post
We're on the smaller end of most arena capacities too. This isn't something to really be proud of, it's a joke what the ticket prices have become. That 18.2% is purely increases in ticket prices because our attendance is identical from last year. This basically tripled already ridiculous inflation figures for the past year. We're all getting robbed every year by Jimmy.
And I shudder to think how much my seats will go up for next year. I dread opening that envelope which should be on its way pretty soon.

broadwayblue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-31-2008, 11:45 AM
  #17
squishy
Registered User
 
squishy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,149
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by broadwayblue View Post
And I shudder to think how much my seats will go up for next year. I dread opening that envelope which should be on its way pretty soon.
Just wait till the finish the renovations.

squishy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-31-2008, 12:07 PM
  #18
pmorris
Registered User
 
pmorris's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NYC Area
Country: United States
Posts: 654
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by nyrmessier011 View Post
We're on the smaller end of most arena capacities too. This isn't something to really be proud of, it's a joke what the ticket prices have become. That 18.2% is purely increases in ticket prices because our attendance is identical from last year. This basically tripled already ridiculous inflation figures for the past year. We're all getting robbed every year by Jimmy.
And our team has barely gotten better over the past 3 years. True we sucked for a while, but I don't think suck is the right word--it's underachieved. Slats brought in proven all-stars like Lindros (who was a mess), Bure (who never played), Fleury (who I enjoyed watching play-we could've found worse), Nedved, Kovalev, and Holik (a fringe player who got All-star money). We went out the year before the lockout and got another star in Jagr, who could have very easily blown up in our face just like Lindros and Bure did. Instead he turns the team around and takes us to the playoffs. But until we get a bonafide 80+ points scorer who can do it next year and in future years (not 80+ point scorers in the twilight of their career like Jagr and Shanny) , we won't get to the Stanley cup finals. Crosby and Malkin and Co. are too good to beat if our best centers are fringe 1st line players like Drury, Gomez, and Dubinsky.

We need a goal scorer, so please Slats, go out and get hossa. At least if we're getting robbed by Jimmy, I can get robbed to watch a Stanley Cup Contending team instead of getting robbed to watch crap hockey. Cause you know the sob dolan is going to run those prices up no matter how many times we lose in the 2nd round of the playoffs.

pmorris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-31-2008, 08:47 PM
  #19
Fletch
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 21,255
vCash: 500
Sucked was the right word...

the teams were poorly constructed, poorly coached and yeah, they underperformed, but they underperformed to a point at which they sucked.

Fletch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-01-2008, 09:43 AM
  #20
pmorris
Registered User
 
pmorris's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NYC Area
Country: United States
Posts: 654
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fletch View Post
the teams were poorly constructed, poorly coached and yeah, they underperformed, but they underperformed to a point at which they sucked.
But I think we also got lucky w/ Jagr, to a point whre now the Rangers overperform. Jagr looked like another aged, whiny, overpriced superstar when he was traded here, just like Lindros and Bure, and he fit in quite nicely. I think it's more Sather was hammering a square peg in a circular hole by bringing all of these superstars, and finally that square peg was just kinda forced in there. But I don't think we're any different now than we were before the lockout, except for we now have a franchise goalie, a superstar who wants to play and not just soak up the nightlife, and prospects who are living up to their potential. Those big changes are enough to get us from the cellar to the playoffs, but the Dolans, being the incompetent thieves they are, think that making it to the 2nd round is the end-all, be-all of the world, when in reality, this team can be better. And the Dolans will make us pay like we're watching a Stanley Cup Champion team, when (although we're a player or two from becoming a serious contender next year), we're also a stroke of bad luck away from not making the playoffs, too.

pmorris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-01-2008, 04:20 PM
  #21
nyrmessier011
Registered User
 
nyrmessier011's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Charlotte/NYC
Country: United States
Posts: 3,347
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to nyrmessier011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fletch View Post
the teams were poorly constructed, poorly coached and yeah, they underperformed, but they underperformed to a point at which they sucked.
Understatement. Looking back I'm almost mad at myself for supporting them the way I did.

nyrmessier011 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:02 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.