Quote:
Originally Posted by Tank Tallinder
Hence the problem with free agency. Very seldom does a team not have to overpay -- whether slightly or grossly -- for a UFA's services.
|
Quite true... but I still think that reason has to weigh into the equation at some point. Stillman seems to be a player who is on the decline and chances are good he's going to want a long term deal with age considered and likely a no-movement clause or at least a no-trade clause.
If you're going to have Stillman signed past next season then mutual concessions should be made. Stillman has stated numerous times that he wants stability. To me that directly translates to him wanting his next stop to perhaps be his last.
I think he'll be looking for two years bare minimum. If a team springs to give him $4 million for two years they're going to be hating that in the second year.
Two years - $6.5 million with a NTC should get the job done for Stillman.