HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > New York Rangers
Notices

Canucks trying to move 10th overall. Can the Rangers move from 20 to 10?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
06-11-2008, 01:08 PM
  #1
BDubinskyNYR17*
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 10,761
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to BDubinskyNYR17*
Canucks trying to move 10th overall. Can the Rangers move from 20 to 10?

http://www.thefourthperiod.com/news/van080611.html The Canucks will try to move their 10th overall pick.


would this work????


Petr Prucha, Fedor Tyutin, 20th overall to Canucks for 10th overall and Alex Burrows.

BDubinskyNYR17* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-11-2008, 01:11 PM
  #2
BklyNYR4Life
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 401
vCash: 500
the canucks are looking for an impact player as part of any deal for that pick. with all the back-and-forth about Tyutin and Prucha on this board, leads me to believe neither are the type of impact player the canucks would be interested in.

BklyNYR4Life is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
06-11-2008, 01:12 PM
  #3
bigblue21
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Country: United States
Posts: 289
vCash: 500
I see zero need to trade Tyutin for the opportunity to pick a better prospect. He is a cheap d-man who is solid on the 2nd pair. Why?

Also yeah Canucks want scoring. Scoring that we don't have to give up.

bigblue21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-11-2008, 01:14 PM
  #4
NYR Viper
Moderator
 
NYR Viper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: PA
Country: United States
Posts: 28,058
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by RCallahan43 View Post
http://www.thefourthperiod.com/news/van080611.html The Canucks will try to move their 10th overall pick.


would this work????


Petr Prucha, Fedor Tyutin, 20th overall to Canucks for 10th overall and Alex Burrows.
i dont think vancouver wants a defenseman.....maybe dawes, prucha, 1st 08

NYR Viper is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
06-11-2008, 01:18 PM
  #5
BDubinskyNYR17*
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 10,761
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to BDubinskyNYR17*
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeyviper87 View Post
i dont think vancouver wants a defenseman.....maybe dawes, prucha, 1st 08
umm luc bourdon got killed, they need a dman to replace him, he would have made the team most likely, soo who knows. maybe backman would fit with all the swedes.

BDubinskyNYR17* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-11-2008, 01:22 PM
  #6
Trxjw
Moderator
Bored.
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Land of no calls..
Country: United States
Posts: 16,372
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by RCallahan43 View Post
http://www.thefourthperiod.com/news/van080611.html The Canucks will try to move their 10th overall pick.


would this work????


Petr Prucha, Fedor Tyutin, 20th overall to Canucks for 10th overall and Alex Burrows.
I don't think the Nucks are looking for anymore D-men. Might garner some interest for Dubinsky with Linden retiring, but I doubt the Rangers give up Dubi for a pick. It'd be nice to have a chance to get Myers though, as he could certainly fill a hole on this team if he develops as well as he is projected to.

Trxjw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-11-2008, 01:22 PM
  #7
DutchShamrock
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Jersey
Country: United States
Posts: 4,964
vCash: 500
I thought after the 7th pick, no one is really that sure-fire, slam-dunk prospect. Lots of great talent, deep, but nothing that is deemed a no-brainer after 7. It's also a deep defensive draft so: We can move an NHL defender that's young and a pick that is 10 spots later for that ealier pick and an opportunity to use it on what is most likely a defenseman that may or may not make the NHL. Or do nothing and draft most likely the same level player at 20.

If we're talking a prospect or an NHLer on the level of Sjostrom or Pock than I'll move up in this draft.

DutchShamrock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-11-2008, 01:22 PM
  #8
Bluenote13
Believe In Henke
 
Bluenote13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: BKLYN, NYC
Posts: 23,635
vCash: 500
Vancouver: "Yeah, lets take the Rangers scraps so they can move up 10 spots!"

And btw, the Vancouver fans would go nuts if the pick was traded to the Rangers of all teams.

Bluenote13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-11-2008, 01:27 PM
  #9
DubiDubiDoo
Registered User
 
DubiDubiDoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Garden City, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 2,927
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to DubiDubiDoo
i would only consider a move to number 10 if it looked something like this..
prucha, backman, 1st 08, 3rd 08, 3rd 09
canucks 1st and 2nd

make no mistake, i still love prucha, but
i want the second round pick to grab marc's brother...

DubiDubiDoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-11-2008, 01:29 PM
  #10
BDubinskyNYR17*
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 10,761
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to BDubinskyNYR17*
Quote:
Originally Posted by DubiDubiDoo View Post
i would only consider a move to number 10 if it looked something like this..
prucha, backman, 1st 08, 3rd 08, 3rd 09
canucks 1st and 2nd

make no mistake, i still love prucha, but
i want the second round pick to grab marc's brother...
agreed. any other players other than Staal that has family that is either in the minors, juniors or NHL?? Sather likes bloodlines, pyatt, sauer, marc staal and maybe jared.

BDubinskyNYR17* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-11-2008, 01:33 PM
  #11
cmb572
 
cmb572's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: New Jersey
Country: United States
Posts: 69
vCash: 500
just a thought but dont you think dubi and staal are untouchables within the rangers roster? with all the talk i saw on the oilers/rangers proposal thread about staal and now offering dubis name in a trade i really just dont see any of it happening. we finally have home grown guys and people think theyll be traded soon? they were rookies last year with amazing seasons and tremendous upsides....i highly doubt sather/renney would be that dumb.......but then again......

cmb572 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-11-2008, 01:35 PM
  #12
poeman
Fixing Rangers PP
 
poeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Country: United States
Posts: 4,587
vCash: 500
they need offense, we need offense

doesnt work

poeman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-11-2008, 01:37 PM
  #13
I Eat Crow
Fear The Mullet
 
I Eat Crow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Country: United States
Posts: 6,057
vCash: 500
The thing is, even if the Rangers get the 10th overall, who would they take? I'd take Boedker in a heartbeat, but I don't think he'll be around come #10.

I Eat Crow is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
06-11-2008, 01:37 PM
  #14
BDubinskyNYR17*
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 10,761
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to BDubinskyNYR17*
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmb572 View Post
just a thought but dont you think dubi and staal are untouchables within the rangers roster? with all the talk i saw on the oilers/rangers proposal thread about staal and now offering dubis name in a trade i really just dont see any of it happening. we finally have home grown guys and people think theyll be traded soon? they were rookies last year with amazing seasons and tremendous upsides....i highly doubt sather/renney would be that dumb.......but then again......
and dubinsky and staal already have leadership qualities, which is hard to find on a first year NHL player. Dubinsky sounds like a vet with what he says in the interviews. I can see Dubinsky with an A in the near future same with Staal. i think gomez or drury are captain with the A switching between the players that have earned it

BDubinskyNYR17* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-11-2008, 01:38 PM
  #15
SedinFan*
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lethbridge, Alberta
Posts: 10,543
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to SedinFan*
Canucks dont need dmen, and they certainly need a better, younger player than Prucha.

SedinFan* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-11-2008, 01:49 PM
  #16
BDubinskyNYR17*
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 10,761
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to BDubinskyNYR17*
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beeker View Post
Canucks dont need dmen, and they certainly need a better, younger player than Prucha.
well they dont have much depth on d


salo ohlund bieksa mitchell, krajicek, edler. they do tend to get injury prone : Salo, Krajicek.

Krajicek played 39 ganes last year. Salo played 63 last year and 66 the year before, so he does have a tendancy to get hurt. Mitchell played 72 games and 62 games the year before so he gets hurt every now and then as well but not as bad as Salo. Bieksa missed alot of time due to a big injury but has stayed healthy. ohlund played only 53 games last year, 77 the year before and has stayed somewhat healthy in the past.


Compaired to the Rangers Staal played 80 games, Rozsival played 80 games, Girardi 82 games, Tyutin 82 games, that is amazing 4 fulltime players on d to play alot of the year. Mara 61 games with a small injury and in and out of lineup. Malik played 42 games same thing little injury and in and out of lineup.


Rangers to have 4 of the top 4 dman to play most of the year is amazing.

BDubinskyNYR17* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-11-2008, 01:50 PM
  #17
SedinFan*
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lethbridge, Alberta
Posts: 10,543
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to SedinFan*
Canucks need scoring a hell of a lot more than a depth dman.

SedinFan* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-11-2008, 02:01 PM
  #18
KeanuReeves
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 361
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beeker View Post
Canucks need scoring a hell of a lot more than a depth dman.
yes but who on the Canucks have the most trade value, that may be expendable?

I'd say Bieksa and Edler probably, and both these guys should be sufficient in being able to bring in some quality offense if they are shopped....

therefore a trade for a reliable 3-6th defenseman may not be too surprising from a canucks point of view, especially if the canucks GM has some ideas on the table that would involve releasing Bieksa or Edler, or even Krajicek packaged with a decent pick or prospect

KeanuReeves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-11-2008, 02:03 PM
  #19
FutureGM97
Registered User
 
FutureGM97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Connecticut, USA
Country: United States
Posts: 6,832
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to FutureGM97
sign and trade Jagr

FutureGM97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-11-2008, 02:04 PM
  #20
TomLaidlaw
Registered User
 
TomLaidlaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Transylvania
Country: Romania
Posts: 3,177
vCash: 500
The Canucks are probably looking to include this pick in a deal to get a sure fire top 6 forward. Who would we give them that would fill that need? I don't see us and the Canucks being a very good fit as trading partners.

TomLaidlaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-11-2008, 02:11 PM
  #21
rypper
Registered User
 
rypper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,761
vCash: 500
alex burrows is untouchable.

sort of.

rypper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-11-2008, 02:12 PM
  #22
frozenrubber
Registered User
 
frozenrubber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Brooklyn
Country: United States
Posts: 1,951
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by RCallahan43 View Post
agreed. any other players other than Staal that has family that is either in the minors, juniors or NHL?? Sather likes bloodlines, pyatt, sauer, marc staal and maybe jared.
Bloodlines are BS and picking Jared Staal in this draft would be a wasted pick. Much along the lines of the Ferraro brothers, letting family names even enter into the consideration in drafting a player is a wasted exercise. Letting these human interest story backgrounds tinge what should only be quantitative & qualitative study of eligible draftees is what leads to another Hugh Jessiman. Stay away from Jared Staal.

The only family member I would like to see the Rangers acquire is Joel Lundqvist. Not because of his name, but because he's a fine and smart player.

frozenrubber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-11-2008, 02:15 PM
  #23
broadwayblue
Registered User
 
broadwayblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NYC
Country: United States
Posts: 15,622
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by RCallahan43 View Post
http://www.thefourthperiod.com/news/van080611.html The Canucks will try to move their 10th overall pick.


would this work????


Petr Prucha, Fedor Tyutin, 20th overall to Canucks for 10th overall and Alex Burrows.
Who do you want to pick at #20 that you think is worth Prucha, Tyutin and our 20th?

broadwayblue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-11-2008, 02:17 PM
  #24
Nich
Registered User
 
Nich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Long Beach, NY
Country: Croatia
Posts: 6,886
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by broadwayblue View Post
Who do you want to pick at #20 that you think is worth Prucha, Tyutin and our 20th?
he has no idea....he just likes useless ideas....

Nich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-11-2008, 02:20 PM
  #25
Barney Gumble
Registered User
 
Barney Gumble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 19,725
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DubiDubiDoo View Post
i would only consider a move to number 10 if it looked something like this..
prucha, backman, 1st 08, 3rd 08, 3rd 09
canucks 1st and 2nd
From a Canucks POV - Pass.

Barney Gumble is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:05 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.