HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > New York Rangers
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Interesting aside from Dellapina's blog about Prucha

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
06-27-2008, 06:40 PM
  #1
007
Olympic nut
 
007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Mannahatta
Country: Lebanon
Posts: 3,476
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to 007 Send a message via MSN to 007
Interesting aside from Dellapina's blog about Prucha

What interests me here is less the question about Straka, it's this part:

Quote:
Fact is, it is difficult to imagine how the Rangers would have tried to re-sign a 35-year-old Straka. They’d like to clear lineup space for younger forwards such as Ryan Callahan, Nigel Dawes and Petr Prucha and have major interest in upgrading up front by signing somebody like Ryan Malone.
Through his tough season, there was a lot of talk of the Rangers getting rid Prucha and there is still talk of him as a trading chip, but it seems that the Rangers may not have given up on him.

I for one am glad. I'm hoping that last year was an anomaly.

http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/ran...a-word-ab.html

007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2008, 06:51 PM
  #2
silverfish
Mr. Glass
 
silverfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Standing on a Train
Country: United States
Posts: 15,622
vCash: 500
I'm just afraid if we give up on Prucha and trade him he'll become a consistent 25 goal scorer on that team. But I also don't like seeing him rot in the press box.

silverfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2008, 07:06 PM
  #3
jas
Unsatisfied
 
jas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 13,188
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYRangers3018 View Post
I'm just afraid if we give up on Prucha and trade him he'll become a consistent 25 goal scorer on that team. But I also don't like seeing him rot in the press box.
I could care less what Prucha does in his new address, as long as the player that comes back helps the Rangers win.

jas is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2008, 07:13 PM
  #4
NYR1724
Registered User
 
NYR1724's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: New York, New York
Country: United States
Posts: 487
vCash: 500
I think that the Rangers are going to give Prucha another chance this year. With the potential departures of Avery, Straka, Shanny, and Jags - they obviously have four spots open on the top two lines. They may give Pru another chance to show some of that form from his rookie season with an expanded role in the offense. Time will tell. My hope is that the Rangers re-sign Jagr, snag a forward like Rolston, and then let kids like Byers and Korpedo make the team to fill out the roster. I don't think they will head in that direction, but I guess that's why I am not the GM.

NYR1724 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2008, 07:14 PM
  #5
we want cup
We do not Sow
 
we want cup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Minneapolis
Country: United States
Posts: 10,720
vCash: 500
Thing is, Prucha can really help the Rangers win himself if Renney gives him the minutes and PP time...

__________________

RANGERS =
we want cup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2008, 07:15 PM
  #6
NYR1724
Registered User
 
NYR1724's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: New York, New York
Country: United States
Posts: 487
vCash: 500
Also - I agree with Jas. I don't mind if the Rangers trade Prucha to acquire an asset that will help this team in the long-term. Its short sided deals like swapping Prucha for aging forward X (Martin Rucinsky, whoever) that have been rumored in the past that bother me.

NYR1724 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2008, 07:21 PM
  #7
SingnBluesOnBroadway
Retired
 
SingnBluesOnBroadway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NYC
Country: United States
Posts: 29,971
vCash: 500
Awards:
Quote:
Originally Posted by 007 View Post
What interests me here is less the question about Straka, it's this part:



Through his tough season, there was a lot of talk of the Rangers getting rid Prucha and there is still talk of him as a trading chip, but it seems that the Rangers may not have given up on him.

I for one am glad. I'm hoping that last year was an anomaly.

http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/ran...a-word-ab.html
Have the Rangers not given up on him or does he have no trade value? Or, and this is probably the most likely scenario to me, is Glen Sather overvalueing him on the trade market?

__________________
SingnBluesOnBroadway is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2008, 07:43 PM
  #8
silverfish
Mr. Glass
 
silverfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Standing on a Train
Country: United States
Posts: 15,622
vCash: 500
Given the right amount of ice time Prucha will produce, no doubt about it. He has the right instinct and isn't afraid to go to the net. He's like a garbage truck.

Like someone said above, if we lose Jags/Straks/Shanny/Avery that's 4 wing spots on the top 2 lines, Prucha will have a regular spot on the team.

silverfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2008, 08:53 PM
  #9
Son of Steinbrenner
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Country: Tromelin
Posts: 9,500
vCash: 500
I think the biggest mistake made with Prucha was moving him from lw to rw last season....I think the rangers could trade him in the right package but i'm not sure who would want him..

Son of Steinbrenner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2008, 08:54 PM
  #10
MisterUnspoken
Vintage
 
MisterUnspoken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: New York
Country: United States
Posts: 10,079
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to MisterUnspoken
Quote:
Originally Posted by SingnBluesOnBroadway View Post
Have the Rangers not given up on him or does he have no trade value? Or, and this is probably the most likely scenario to me, is Glen Sather overvalueing him on the trade market?
Who says he's even looking to move him?

MisterUnspoken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2008, 08:55 PM
  #11
Cherepanisimov
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,181
vCash: 500
he played good when he actually played. he's coming into only his fourth season, give the kid a shot.

Cherepanisimov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2008, 09:27 PM
  #12
NYR Sting
Heart and Soul
 
NYR Sting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 9,506
vCash: 500
Don't forget, guys, that Prucha's success was directly connected to the success of Jagr.

I like Petr Prucha a lot, he seems like a great kid and he has a lot of heart and guts, but I can't help but remember how much his numbers had to do with Jagr.

16 of his 30 rookie season goals were power play goals, the same season that Jaromir Jagr broke team scoring records and ran the power play. The next year, Jagr was a little less effective, so was Prucha. Only scored 8 PP goals that year. You get the drift, right? I'd like to think Prucha is capable of creating offense himself, but I don't think the evidence backs that belief up.

Plus, his best offensive skill, his quick shot, hasn't looked the same the last two years. I would say that even 2 years ago, he wasn't that great. I think the 22 goals make it seem as if he was a bigger part of the team than he really was.

Maybe he just needs a change of scenery, but more than likely, he just isn't as good as many of us want him to be.

NYR Sting is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2008, 09:43 PM
  #13
Beacon
Sent to HF Minors
 
Beacon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Country: United States
Posts: 8,517
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by we want cup View Post
Thing is, Prucha can really help the Rangers win himself if Renney gives him the minutes and PP time...
I think Pru should be used as a PP specialist. He could definitely be useful there.

I would try him together with Gomez. A playmaker together with a pure scorer like Prucha may work out. It almost definitely won't work out with Drury or Dubi.

Beacon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2008, 10:47 PM
  #14
RANGERS2448
Registered User
 
RANGERS2448's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 389
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by 007 View Post
What interests me here is less the question about Straka, it's this part:



Through his tough season, there was a lot of talk of the Rangers getting rid Prucha and there is still talk of him as a trading chip, but it seems that the Rangers may not have given up on him.

I for one am glad. I'm hoping that last year was an anomaly.

http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/ran...a-word-ab.html

prucha should be on 1 of the top 3 lines this yr and on the pp

RANGERS2448 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2008, 10:55 PM
  #15
squishy
Registered User
 
squishy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,149
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sting36e View Post
Don't forget, guys, that Prucha's success was directly connected to the success of Jagr.

I like Petr Prucha a lot, he seems like a great kid and he has a lot of heart and guts, but I can't help but remember how much his numbers had to do with Jagr.

16 of his 30 rookie season goals were power play goals, the same season that Jaromir Jagr broke team scoring records and ran the power play. The next year, Jagr was a little less effective, so was Prucha. Only scored 8 PP goals that year. You get the drift, right?
Or, his drop in power play production could have something to do with his drop power play time...

2005-2006: 3:49 min/game
2006-2007: 2:53 min/game
2007-2008: 1:38 min/game

squishy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2008, 10:57 PM
  #16
Radek27
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 5,173
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Radek27
I have a feeling both Prucha and Backman are going to have solid seasons making a lot of people on here look...........silly.

Radek27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2008, 11:09 PM
  #17
FLYLine24
The Mac Truck
 
FLYLine24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: NY
Country: United States
Posts: 29,674
vCash: 500
Im just going to say it.....Prucha's rookie season was a fluke. A complete fluke. He will never sniff 30 goals again.

Jagr MADE Prucha his rookie season. Without Jagr...Prucha is nothing.

Sorry...i've given up on Petr Puck. He is too weak for the NHL, 175 pounds is not cutting it. He gets knocked off the puck way too easily, and its also a matter of time till he gets seriously injured with one of those monster hits he takes every other game.


Flame away boys..but thats my opinion. Kid has heart..but it's not enough. He will put up another 10-13 goals this season...then Sather will give him the boot.

FLYLine24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2008, 11:12 PM
  #18
we want cup
We do not Sow
 
we want cup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Minneapolis
Country: United States
Posts: 10,720
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by FLYLine88 View Post
Im just going to say it.....Prucha's rookie season was a fluke. A complete fluke. He will never sniff 30 goals again.

Jagr MADE Prucha his rookie season. Without Jagr...Prucha is nothing.

Sorry...i've given up on Petr Puck. He is too weak for the NHL, 175 pounds is not cutting it. He gets knocked off the puck way too easily, and its also a matter of time till he gets seriously injured with one of those monster hits he takes every other game.


Flame away boys..but thats my opinion. Kid has heart..but it's not enough. He will put up another 10-13 goals this season...then Sather will give him the boot.
Brian Gionta weighs 175 but still put up a 48 goal season and 3 20 goal seasons

we want cup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2008, 11:15 PM
  #19
squishy
Registered User
 
squishy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,149
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by FLYLine88 View Post
He is too weak for the NHL, 175 pounds is not cutting it.
Patrick Kane says hello.

squishy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-27-2008, 11:34 PM
  #20
FLYLine24
The Mac Truck
 
FLYLine24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: NY
Country: United States
Posts: 29,674
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by we want cup View Post
Brian Gionta weighs 175 but still put up a 48 goal season and 3 20 goal seasons

Quote:
Originally Posted by squishy View Post
Patrick Kane says hello.
Both of them can say hello all they want to Pru...but unfortunately they are not Prucha.

FLYLine24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-28-2008, 12:20 AM
  #21
FutureGM97
Registered User
 
FutureGM97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Connecticut, USA
Country: United States
Posts: 6,833
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to FutureGM97
Shouldn't the Rangers give Prucha a legitimate chance of playing on a scoring line without jagr for an extended period of time before completely giving up on him?

FutureGM97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-28-2008, 12:24 AM
  #22
MidnightRanger
Registered User
 
MidnightRanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New York City
Country: United States
Posts: 1,521
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to MidnightRanger
I've never thought the Rangers had any intention of dealing Prucha. They just sat him in favor of experienced guys like Shannahan and Straka. He needs to be in the second line to produce.

MidnightRanger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-28-2008, 12:29 AM
  #23
Trxjw
Retired.
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Land of no calls..
Country: United States
Posts: 16,562
vCash: 500
To succeed, Prucha needs to be on a line where he considered to be the worst player. Meaning he needs to be getting the least amount of attention from the opposing defense, as they're more concerned with the other two players.

Prucha's value is so low right now that he'll probably be kept on to see if he regains his form next season. If not, I imagine he'll be moved for whatever they can get for him.

Trxjw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-28-2008, 01:50 AM
  #24
NYR Viper
Moderator
 
NYR Viper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: PA
Country: United States
Posts: 28,743
vCash: 500
now i know people might think im crazy, however why is it people bash parenteau for his defensive awareness and yet let prucha slide by....IMO, i would rather have the 6'0 190-200 lbs parenteau considering he can CREATE offense rather than the 5-11 175 lbs prucha who can only score garbage goals......

IMO parenteau is the better option as he is cheaper and a more well-rounded player, i say give him a shot over petr and before people say parenteau hasnt played in the nhl and prucha has scored 30 goals before in the nhl....i dont care....he played horribly last year and was benched most of the year, i think parenteau could do that just as well and cost less

NYR Viper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-28-2008, 02:13 AM
  #25
MidnightRanger
Registered User
 
MidnightRanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New York City
Country: United States
Posts: 1,521
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to MidnightRanger
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeyviper87 View Post
now i know people might think im crazy, however why is it people bash parenteau for his defensive awareness and yet let prucha slide by....IMO, i would rather have the 6'0 190-200 lbs parenteau considering he can CREATE offense rather than the 5-11 175 lbs prucha who can only score garbage goals......

IMO parenteau is the better option as he is cheaper and a more well-rounded player, i say give him a shot over petr and before people say parenteau hasnt played in the nhl and prucha has scored 30 goals before in the nhl....i dont care....he played horribly last year and was benched most of the year, i think parenteau could do that just as well and cost less

MidnightRanger is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:28 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.