HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > Fantasy Hockey Talk > Mock Drafts
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Mock Drafts Mock drafts for fun and fantasy here.

Peter's mock draft

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
06-22-2004, 11:42 PM
  #1
Peter
Registered User
 
Peter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Alberta
Posts: 3,671
vCash: 500
Peter's mock draft

Here it is - hot off the presses.

1) Wash: Ovechkin (really is there any doubt)
2) Pitts: Malkin
3) Chic: Barker (although Chicago might trade this pick)
4) Colb: Ladd
5) Phoex: Tukonen
6) Rags: Olesz
7) Florida: Schwarz
8) Car: Schremp
9) Anaheim: Thelen (although the might trade up to nab Ladd)
10) Atl:Smid
11) LA: Montoya (desperately need a goalie)
12) Minn: Stafford
13) Buff: Meszaros
14) Ed: Lisin
15) Nash: Picard
16) Islanders: Radulov
17) St. Louis: Korpikoski
18) Mont: Wolski (may trade up to nab Picard)
19) Calg: Valabik
20) Dallas: Chipchura
21) Col: Bolland
22) NJ: Green
23) Ottawa: Schultz
24) Rags: Zajac
25) Ed: Dubnyk
26) Van: Fransson
27) Wash: Nokelaimen
28) SJ: Alexandrov
29) Wash: Lyamin
30) TB: Sindel

Frag away!!

Peter is offline  
Old
06-22-2004, 11:44 PM
  #2
Chaos
3, 2, 1
 
Chaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Country: United States
Posts: 7,796
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to Chaos
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter
Here it is - hot off the presses.

1) Wash: Ovechkin (really is there any doubt)
2) Pitts: Malkin
3) Chic: Barker (although Chicago might trade this pick)
4) Colb: Ladd
5) Phoex: Tukonen
6) Rags: Olesz
7) Florida: Schwarz
8) Car: Schremp
9) Anaheim: Thelen (although the might trade up to nab Ladd)
10) Atl:Smid
11) LA: Montoya (desperately need a goalie)
12) Minn: Stafford
13) Buff: Meszaros
14) Ed: Lisin
15) Nash: Picard
16) Islanders: Radulov
17) St. Louis: Korpikoski
18) Mont: Wolski (may trade up to nab Picard)
19) Calg: Valabik
20) Dallas: Chipchura
21) Col: Bolland
22) NJ: Green
23) Ottawa: Schultz
24) Rags: Zajac
25) Ed: Dubnyk
26) Van: Fransson
27) Wash: Nokelaimen
28) SJ: Alexandrov
29) Wash: Lyamin
30) TB: Sindel

Frag away!!
I highly, highly doubt Dallas would take Chipchura over Green.

Chaos is offline  
Old
06-22-2004, 11:54 PM
  #3
Peter
Registered User
 
Peter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Alberta
Posts: 3,671
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starsfan09
I highly, highly doubt Dallas would take Chipchura over Green.
You could be right but this is how I figured it. Green, on most accounts, is a bit of a risk. High potential and good character: just the type of player NJ loves to draft.

On the other hand, Chipchura is a total safe bet and an excellent 2nd to 3rd line NHL player: just the type of player Dallas loves to draft.

Peter is offline  
Old
06-23-2004, 12:12 AM
  #4
sharkyz15
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Dirty Dirty SC
Country: Belarus
Posts: 2,330
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to sharkyz15 Send a message via Yahoo to sharkyz15
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter
Here it is - hot off the presses.

1) Wash: Ovechkin (really is there any doubt)
2) Pitts: Malkin
3) Chic: Barker (although Chicago might trade this pick)
4) Colb: Ladd
5) Phoex: Tukonen
6) Rags: Olesz
7) Florida: Schwarz
8) Car: Schremp
9) Anaheim: Thelen (although the might trade up to nab Ladd)
10) Atl:Smid
11) LA: Montoya (desperately need a goalie)
12) Minn: Stafford
13) Buff: Meszaros
14) Ed: Lisin
15) Nash: Picard
16) Islanders: Radulov
17) St. Louis: Korpikoski
18) Mont: Wolski (may trade up to nab Picard)
19) Calg: Valabik
20) Dallas: Chipchura
21) Col: Bolland
22) NJ: Green
23) Ottawa: Schultz
24) Rags: Zajac
25) Ed: Dubnyk
26) Van: Fransson
27) Wash: Nokelaimen
28) SJ: Alexandrov
29) Wash: Lyamin
30) TB: Sindel

Frag away!!
I hope the Sharks take Alexandrov but I was just wondering why you had them picking him?

sharkyz15 is offline  
Old
06-23-2004, 12:16 AM
  #5
IslesJack
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 394
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to IslesJack Send a message via AIM to IslesJack
I think the Islanders will go with a defenseman since we lack a qaulity defensive prospects, although I would welcome Radulov especially if the reports of him being nothing like his brother work ethic wise are true.

Although I am weart of drafting a Russian because of this crap with the IIHF.

IslesJack is offline  
Old
06-23-2004, 12:17 AM
  #6
sehnsucht
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 614
vCash: 500
just an observation but I doubt that Sutter would take another defenceman over the ultimate, prototype Sutter-player in Chipchura. Darryl would be weeping with joy if Chipchura fell to 19th

sehnsucht is offline  
Old
06-23-2004, 12:36 AM
  #7
Narnia
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Narnia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Surrey, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 14,394
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to Narnia
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter
Here it is - hot off the presses.

1) Wash: Ovechkin (really is there any doubt)
2) Pitts: Malkin
3) Chic: Barker (although Chicago might trade this pick)
4) Colb: Ladd
5) Phoex: Tukonen
6) Rags: Olesz
7) Florida: Schwarz
8) Car: Schremp
9) Anaheim: Thelen (although the might trade up to nab Ladd)
10) Atl:Smid
11) LA: Montoya (desperately need a goalie)
12) Minn: Stafford
13) Buff: Meszaros
14) Ed: Lisin
15) Nash: Picard
16) Islanders: Radulov
17) St. Louis: Korpikoski
18) Mont: Wolski (may trade up to nab Picard)
19) Calg: Valabik
20) Dallas: Chipchura
21) Col: Bolland
22) NJ: Green
23) Ottawa: Schultz
24) Rags: Zajac
25) Ed: Dubnyk
26) Van: Fransson
27) Wash: Nokelaimen
28) SJ: Alexandrov
29) Wash: Lyamin
30) TB: Sindel

Frag away!!
I highly doubt the Oilers would draft Lisen ahead of Picard.

__________________
"He just ate up Robyn Regehr for dinner, a spectacular play by Hemsky, and Robyn Regehr has got doo doo all over his face" - Rod Phillips call on Hemsky's goal vs the Flames
Narnia is offline  
Old
06-23-2004, 01:57 AM
  #8
Peter
Registered User
 
Peter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Alberta
Posts: 3,671
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemsky83
I highly doubt the Oilers would draft Lisen ahead of Picard.
Really? You don't think that they would want an extremely fast offensive player over a 3rd line, maybe a 2nd line, defensive forward? I think, being in the Western Conference, Edmonton would opt for the offensive upside of Lisin.

Peter is offline  
Old
06-23-2004, 02:09 AM
  #9
Narnia
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Narnia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Surrey, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 14,394
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to Narnia
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter
Really? You don't think that they would want an extremely fast offensive player over a 3rd line, maybe a 2nd line, defensive forward? I think, being in the Western Conference, Edmonton would opt for the offensive upside of Lisin.
Another problem is that Lisen is from Russia and my small market Oilers can't afford the transfer fee they might have to pay. I don't see the Oilers drafting a Russian unless he's playing in the CHL.

Narnia is offline  
Old
06-23-2004, 03:05 AM
  #10
#2
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,290
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to #2
Florida has Roberto Luongo!!!!!!

#2 is offline  
Old
06-23-2004, 07:15 AM
  #11
tripledekehockey
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: pittsburgh pa
Country: United States
Posts: 2,256
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to tripledekehockey Send a message via AIM to tripledekehockey
i think if thelan is available to the canes they go with him to bolster a weak defensive corp

otherwise, very nice mock draft

tripledekehockey is offline  
Old
06-23-2004, 08:56 AM
  #12
jas
Unsatisfied
 
jas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 13,219
vCash: 500
Zajac to the Rangers is not bad, but, I have a feeling that if Lyamin is on the board at that spot, he's the choice, especially if the Rangers take Olesz at #6. If the Rangers take Ladd or Thelen at #6, or if they are able to grab an additional #1 pick, then I could see Zajac as the choice.

jas is offline  
Old
06-23-2004, 10:16 AM
  #13
Alouette_19
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Montreal
Posts: 416
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter
Really? You don't think that they would want an extremely fast offensive player over a 3rd line, maybe a 2nd line, defensive forward? I think, being in the Western Conference, Edmonton would opt for the offensive upside of Lisin.
Picard is clearly not a defensive forward. Picard is a offensive player only with a good shape able to play physival if needed. But I agree that he will maybe become a 2nd or 3rd line player but he must improve his defence.

For the mock it's a nice one....I would be surprise if Calagary don't selected Chippy if he's available.

The biggest problem is Florida with Schwarz ????

Alouette_19 is offline  
Old
06-23-2004, 10:23 AM
  #14
Chaos
3, 2, 1
 
Chaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Country: United States
Posts: 7,796
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to Chaos
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter
You could be right but this is how I figured it. Green, on most accounts, is a bit of a risk. High potential and good character: just the type of player NJ loves to draft.

On the other hand, Chipchura is a total safe bet and an excellent 2nd to 3rd line NHL player: just the type of player Dallas loves to draft.
Here's the problem with that...almost all of our top forward prospects are 2nd/3rd liners. We definately dont need anymore of those, and with Green still on the board, Chipchura sure isnt the BPA.

Chaos is offline  
Old
06-23-2004, 10:54 AM
  #15
Peter
Registered User
 
Peter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Alberta
Posts: 3,671
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by jas
Zajac to the Rangers is not bad, but, I have a feeling that if Lyamin is on the board at that spot, he's the choice, especially if the Rangers take Olesz at #6. If the Rangers take Ladd or Thelen at #6, or if they are able to grab an additional #1 pick, then I could see Zajac as the choice.
In today's Edmonton Sun it said that both the Oilers and Rangers want Stafford and that he would go at #6. I find that hard to believe.

Peter is offline  
Old
06-23-2004, 11:15 AM
  #16
jas
Unsatisfied
 
jas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 13,219
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter
In today's Edmonton Sun it said that both the Oilers and Rangers want Stafford and that he would go at #6. I find that hard to believe.
I think that might be Sather blowing smoke. I personally think the Rangers will take Ladd at #6. They scouted him heavily and like him a lot. And, he fits the profile of the type of player the Rangers are targetting these days.

jas is offline  
Old
06-23-2004, 11:30 AM
  #17
Flames Draft Watcher
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Calgary
Posts: 4,553
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by jas
I think that might be Sather blowing smoke. I personally think the Rangers will take Ladd at #6. They scouted him heavily and like him a lot. And, he fits the profile of the type of player the Rangers are targetting these days.
Ladd and Stafford don't seem that dissimilar to me based on the scouting reports I've read. Personally I'd love to land either of them.

Flames Draft Watcher is offline  
Old
06-23-2004, 11:41 AM
  #18
jas
Unsatisfied
 
jas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 13,219
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher
Ladd and Stafford don't seem that dissimilar to me based on the scouting reports I've read. Personally I'd love to land either of them.
I don't necessarily disagree. I just have seen Ladd rated higher on most rankings.

jas is offline  
Old
06-23-2004, 11:56 AM
  #19
Flames Draft Watcher
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Calgary
Posts: 4,553
vCash: 500
Agreed. Ladd does seem higher by the consensus. Read an article today where the Blackhawks head scout seemed quite high on him and Barker. I've heard Columbus might be interested, same with the Rangers. Read another article today where Jim Rutherford of Carolina said he doesn't think Ladd will still be there at #8.

Flames Draft Watcher is offline  
Old
06-24-2004, 12:52 PM
  #20
Peter
Registered User
 
Peter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Alberta
Posts: 3,671
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher
Agreed. Ladd does seem higher by the consensus. Read an article today where the Blackhawks head scout seemed quite high on him and Barker. I've heard Columbus might be interested, same with the Rangers. Read another article today where Jim Rutherford of Carolina said he doesn't think Ladd will still be there at #8.
I think Ladd has moved up into the top 5 - I do not see him falling any lower than that.

Peter is offline  
Old
06-24-2004, 01:17 PM
  #21
Pwnasaurus
Registered User
 
Pwnasaurus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Robot City
Country: United States
Posts: 5,826
vCash: 500
If the Panthers do take a goalie they will opt for Montoya over Schwarz for sheer ticket sales alone.

Pwnasaurus is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:11 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.