If I was Lombardi I would either waive Gauthier or Harrold to make room for Quincy. I think he would be more valuable to the Kings than either of them. The only issue is.....would anyone pick up Gauthier or Harrold on waivers? Because I do not think that Dean wants to pay NHL wages for an AHL player.
If I was Lombardi I would either waive Gauthier or Harrold to make room for Quincy. I think he would be more valuable to the Kings than either of them. The only issue is.....would anyone pick up Gauthier or Harrold on waivers? Because I do not think that Dean wants to pay NHL wages for an AHL player.
I think we're pretty set at defense for the time being.
In a couple of playoff games in 06-07, he was the best d-man on the ice. But Holland still values Chelios more than him. I expect he's a better player than Gauthier.
He's played 13 NHL regular season games. Why waive Gauthier for him?
Because Quincey has some upside and Gauthier would probably pass through waivers and help the kids in Manchester. If a team picked Gauthier up on waivers I would be surprised.
Getting Quincey could fast forward the development of the young defense a bit, and if he doesn't pan out no big deal.
would take him in a heart beat.Waive Gauth,no one will pick him up right now.Quincey is tough similar to Greene but can move the puck a little better fits in with the age group of our core ,played in Missy with Sully good leader team player that has been brought along carefully by the Wings. Take Him!
would take him in a heart beat.Waive Gauth,no one will pick him up right now.Quincey is tough similar to Greene but can move the puck a little better fits in with the age group of our core ,played in Missy with Sully good leader team player that has been brought along carefully by the Wings. Take Him!
...and Anaheim was ready to trade him for a 2nd rounder or something akin to that. Lombardi blew that one. Is this even arguable anymore? I recall he said in the press that he didn't want Bryz. It wasn't lack of opportunity. It was lack of intent.
