HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Atlantic Division > Montreal Canadiens
Notices

GDT: 10/13/08 Montreal @ Philadelphia 7PM EDT RDS (HD)

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
10-13-2008, 09:10 PM
  #926
JrHockeyFan
Registered User
 
JrHockeyFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,521
vCash: 500
Wow. Interesting game

Off the top I like the way Hammer is getting so into the offensive part of the game

Next thing, that Sbisa kid on D for Philly! That is talent. Cool calm and collected. Great shot. Good D. Played smart. Put him on your wish list BG

You ticked me off with that dumb retaliation penalty SKost. You redeemed yourself chasing down your own shot and setting up Lang. Great and VERY important goal

TKost. What a tenacious fore-checker. Way to go Nonstopoulus

Good game by Price, but those point shots Carter says that was his first slap shot goal

Downie and Hartnell What a pair of jerks

Good two points guys

JrHockeyFan is offline  
Old
10-13-2008, 09:12 PM
  #927
LilWinger11
 
LilWinger11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Connecticut
Country: United States
Posts: 5,179
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hackett View Post
isnt there an automatic suspension for fighting after the game is over, and if so, what happens to latendresse?

can someone clarify this situation... I seem to recall that a fight after the buzzer is an automatic suspension but I'm not 100% sure.
I know if you fight and get the extra 2:00 for instigating with under 5:00 to play it's a one-game suspension

LilWinger11 is offline  
Old
10-13-2008, 09:18 PM
  #928
Hackett
HF Needs Feeny
 
Hackett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Country: Canada
Posts: 15,297
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LilWinger11 View Post
I know if you fight and get the extra 2:00 for instigating with under 5:00 to play it's a one-game suspension
yeah, I'm aware of that. But I think they are stricter after the final buzzer.

Anyways, I guess somebody would have brought it up by now if that was an issue.

Hackett is offline  
Old
10-13-2008, 09:27 PM
  #929
Canadiens Fan
Registered User
 
Canadiens Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 735
vCash: 500
Random thoughts on tonight's game from the Hockey News Canadiens Blog.

http://www.thehockeynews.com/article...hilly-war.html

Canadiens Fan is offline  
Old
10-13-2008, 09:49 PM
  #930
Maxpac
Registered User
 
Maxpac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: hockey city
Posts: 13,429
vCash: 500
I don't know if it's been discussed yet but apperently that post that Lang hit in the 2nd was actually in and hit the the inside cross-bar, we were losing 2-1 when it happend

Maxpac is offline  
Old
10-13-2008, 09:55 PM
  #931
Galchenyuk x 27
Registered User
 
Galchenyuk x 27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Montreal
Country: Canada
Posts: 17,594
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxpac View Post
I don't know if it's been discussed yet but apperently that post that Lang hit in the 2nd was actually in and hit the the inside cross-bar, we were losing 2-1 when it happend
I saw the replay, clearly hit the post

Galchenyuk x 27 is offline  
Old
10-13-2008, 10:00 PM
  #932
hackeyisneat
Incostitsynt
 
hackeyisneat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 492
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canadiens Fan View Post
Random thoughts on tonight's game from the Hockey News Canadiens Blog.

http://www.thehockeynews.com/article...hilly-war.html
No Breezer in the third...interesting

I thought for sure that one that Briere was complaining about went in, (when it was 2-1), looked from above like it was over the line, maybe i'm missing something

hackeyisneat is offline  
Old
10-13-2008, 10:03 PM
  #933
Hackett
HF Needs Feeny
 
Hackett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Country: Canada
Posts: 15,297
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by blicemj View Post
No Breezer in the third...interesting

I thought for sure that one that Briere was complaining about went in, (when it was 2-1), looked from above like it was over the line, maybe i'm missing something
it was a goofy overhead angle

they didnt have the overhead camera directly above the goaline which made it tough to interpret.

Hackett is offline  
Old
10-13-2008, 10:14 PM
  #934
Galchenyuk x 27
Registered User
 
Galchenyuk x 27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Montreal
Country: Canada
Posts: 17,594
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by blicemj View Post
No Breezer in the third...interesting

I thought for sure that one that Briere was complaining about went in, (when it was 2-1), looked from above like it was over the line, maybe i'm missing something
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hackett View Post
it was a goofy overhead angle

they didnt have the overhead camera directly above the goaline which made it tough to interpret.
like Hackett said.
The overhead camera was not directly above the net.
It was an indirect angle which made it look in.
the best angle was the one on the side of the net at ice level, clearly showed it wasnt even close.

Galchenyuk x 27 is offline  
Old
10-13-2008, 10:18 PM
  #935
znk
Registered User
 
znk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Montreal
Country: Canada
Posts: 25,102
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by blicemj View Post
No Breezer in the third...interesting

I thought for sure that one that Briere was complaining about went in, (when it was 2-1), looked from above like it was over the line, maybe i'm missing something
Geometry.

znk is offline  
Old
10-13-2008, 10:18 PM
  #936
zx81
Registered User
 
zx81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,445
vCash: 500
BTW S.Kost wasn't on the ice on Komisarek's goal and he got an assist. That's how good he is

Seriously they should correct it because it was Lats and not S. Kost

zx81 is offline  
Old
10-13-2008, 10:21 PM
  #937
hackeyisneat
Incostitsynt
 
hackeyisneat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 492
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by znk View Post
Geometry.
set my self up, thanks for the heads up guys

man price can really move, by looking at this gdt ten pages back people were ready to give up on him

hackeyisneat is offline  
Old
10-13-2008, 10:21 PM
  #938
Galchenyuk x 27
Registered User
 
Galchenyuk x 27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Montreal
Country: Canada
Posts: 17,594
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by zx81 View Post
BTW S.Kost wasn't on the ice on Komisarek's goal and he got an assist. That's how good he is

Seriously they should correct it because it was Lats and not S. Kost
I was asking myself before, wasnt Skost on the bench.
Sucks that NHL.com doesnt tell us who was on the ice anymore.

Galchenyuk x 27 is offline  
Old
10-13-2008, 10:25 PM
  #939
zx81
Registered User
 
zx81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,445
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaydee96 View Post
I was asking myself before, wasnt Skost on the bench.
Sucks that NHL.com doesnt tell us who was on the ice anymore.
They still show this stats.
http://www.nhl.com/scores/htmlreport...9/GS020035.HTM

And there is obviously a mistake.
They have those players on the ice
8, 11, 31, 74, 79, 84

They missed Tanguay who was clearly on the ice and Kostitsyn wasn't.

zx81 is offline  
Old
10-13-2008, 10:29 PM
  #940
hackeyisneat
Incostitsynt
 
hackeyisneat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 492
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by zx81 View Post
They still show this stats.
http://www.nhl.com/scores/htmlreport...9/GS020035.HTM

And there is obviously a mistake.
They have those players on the ice
8, 11, 31, 74, 79, 84

They missed Tanguay who was clearly on the ice and Kostitsyn wasn't.
tangs would be even then
sure didn't get a lot of minutes, comparing the two teams the habs ice time is spaced out a lot more

hackeyisneat is offline  
Old
10-13-2008, 10:31 PM
  #941
Shred
Registered User
 
Shred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 810
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by zx81 View Post
BTW S.Kost wasn't on the ice on Komisarek's goal and he got an assist. That's how good he is

Seriously they should correct it because it was Lats and not S. Kost
If you are right and they do correct it, will you retroactively change the points for the GPT?

Shred is offline  
Old
10-13-2008, 10:35 PM
  #942
zx81
Registered User
 
zx81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,445
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shred View Post
If you are right and they do correct it, will you retroactively change the points for the GPT?
Sure.
I want that point

Something similar happened last year and they corrected it the day after.

zx81 is offline  
Old
10-13-2008, 10:42 PM
  #943
Habs10Habs
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Habs10Habs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 52,249
vCash: 500
Let's continue this in the Post game thread.

__________________
Don Cherry is right...you don't poke the bear..you walk right up to it and punch it in the mouth. - Grant McCagg
Habs10Habs is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:03 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.