HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > National Hockey League Talk
National Hockey League Talk Discuss NHL players, teams, games, and the Stanley Cup Playoffs.

Ban Hitting?

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
07-01-2004, 09:33 PM
  #26
Vlad The Impaler
Registered User
 
Vlad The Impaler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Montreal
Posts: 11,716
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Takkie
i think this thread is all a joke played on us. i dont think anyone on this board would actually think of taking out such an integral part of the game.
Yes, it looks like trolling.

Actually, these discussions are always interesting to me. i know some fans would like to see less injuries, more finesse, etc. That's their opinion and a matter of taste.

I love hard fought, intense games with physical play. Injuries are the toll to pay but as long as it is reasonable risks, that's ok with me.

I would however ban ANY and EVERY hit to the head.

Vlad The Impaler is offline  
Old
07-02-2004, 02:57 AM
  #27
f1nn
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Espoo, Finland
Country: Finland
Posts: 2,769
vCash: 1312
Send a message via AIM to f1nn
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russian_fanatic
How about we ban goal scoring too ? That way both teams are winners , and no one gets their feeling hurt ? Then all the teams win the Stanley Cup , because they're all winners !

yeah and no sticks... they can be dangerous... instead the players will have fairy wands and their team uniforms will be pink tootoos with logos on them

f1nn is offline  
Old
07-02-2004, 08:41 AM
  #28
Petey21
Registered User
 
Petey21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sweden
Country: Sweden
Posts: 1,359
vCash: 500
Can't ban hitting in "real hockey" leagues, that'd turn the game more or less into a "show" as the one seen in Slapshot 2, but for players that don't tolerate hitting there are always those adult non-contact leagues.

Petey21 is offline  
Old
07-02-2004, 03:22 PM
  #29
Malefic74
Registered User
 
Malefic74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Halfway between Nothing and Not Much Else
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,752
vCash: 500
I don't have a problem with hitting. What I have a problem with is these overpaid babies who can't take one.

They put themselves in a bad position, get rocked, then get get up and go wrestle with the guy starting an absolutely pointless fight.

What ever happened to taking his number?

Malefic74 is offline  
Old
07-02-2004, 03:44 PM
  #30
Russian_fanatic
Registered User
 
Russian_fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,638
vCash: 500
I hate these post saying ban hitting ! Why ? If you want to be in the NHL you join with a risk ! They're enforcers that will challenge you , their will be best like Ruutu who will hit , and try to tick you off . yeeshhh...

Russian_fanatic is offline  
Old
07-02-2004, 06:42 PM
  #31
bhj
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 205
vCash: 500
To me

ban hitting = End of hockey

bhj is offline  
Old
07-03-2004, 11:08 AM
  #32
beebs
Registered User
 
beebs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Alberta
Country: Canada
Posts: 469
vCash: 500
Hockey without hitting=baseball without the bat.

beebs is offline  
Old
07-03-2004, 02:40 PM
  #33
Russian_fanatic
Registered User
 
Russian_fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,638
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeBeebs
Hockey without hitting=baseball without the bat.
Perfect !

Russian_fanatic is offline  
Old
07-03-2004, 03:02 PM
  #34
Vlad The Impaler
Registered User
 
Vlad The Impaler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Montreal
Posts: 11,716
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Malefic74
I don't have a problem with hitting. What I have a problem with is these overpaid babies who can't take one.

They put themselves in a bad position, get rocked, then get get up and go wrestle with the guy starting an absolutely pointless fight.

What ever happened to taking his number?
A fair question and I somewhat agree with you. However, I think I know in part what happened.

There was a time where you were KOed and that was that. KOed. It wasn't really considered a big deal. Today, KOed is not the words that come first when you go down. The word is concussion and it carries more long term consequences. The effect is the same but perception has changed.

Throwing your trash in a park after a picnic in 1973 is not the same as throwing it in 2004. The effect is the same but perception has greatly change.

This is what happened to hockey fans and to an extent, players themselves. They know when they get rocked, their career is at risk. They hear about potential repercussions much more than they did in 1973. Concussions are frightening because doctors know so little about the brain. I have been there (not concussions but other health problems) and it is downright frightening when a doctor doesn't seem able to help you and pinpoint a problem.

One constant everybody seems to agree upon is that concussions are likely to make you prone to more concussions, and that the more rest you take the better you will be but the curve of recovery is an individual one and difficult to asess even on a case by case basis.

I think you will agree with me that is not comforting for anybody, especially considering careers are relatively short in the NHL.

Lastly, I disagree with the way you portray the problem. It doesn't affect just overpaid babies but pretty much all NHL players. Yes, sometimes concussions are due to players not protecting themselves but not always. There is not much you can do in certain situations and there are also illegal assaults.

Concussions are a real problem and IMO, it needs to be addressed in this sport until we know more about concussions. We must consider for now that safe is better than sorry and have a zero tolerance policy.

I agree 100% with you that the old times (taking it like a man and taking the number on the back of the jersey) kicked ass. It was great. However, just take a look at those guys in the 70s and you will see they are NO MATCH for the players today physically. They are trained much better, are faster and stronger. The problem is, there is way you can train or "muscle up" your brain.

In other words, the conditioning and training has reached a point that the brain cannot match. We have pushed the limit, which is great for hockey as a whole but has led to this problem. Players get rocked, they skate fast with great momentum and velocity. The shoulder pads are more lethal than they ever were too.

Times have changed.

Doesn't mean we should settle for wussy, non-contact hockey but I think the problem of concussions will not go away and will need to be addressed.

Vlad The Impaler is offline  
Old
07-03-2004, 03:51 PM
  #35
Verbal Kint*
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Bunny Vatican
Country: Canada
Posts: 20,133
vCash: 500
You want to name careers ruined by hitting? I'll name a few who would never be the same if it was banned.

Roberts, Tucker, Tkachuk, Roenick, Hatcher, Chara, McCabe, McLaren, Cairns,

The list goes on. Hitting is a part of the game and injuries happen. Sure its a shame when they do, but I doubt the NFL's going to change to tag football just because some players get hurt. I know lets make boxing gloves filled with a 10 inch think layer of sponge to soften the blow! Hitting is a part of the game and its here to stay.

Verbal Kint* is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:01 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.