HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

1st overall pick in 09

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
12-02-2008, 09:31 PM
  #26
Crimson Devil*
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: In a gutted caribou.
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,131
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blades of Glory View Post
A whole lot of quantity and not a lot of quality.
Gionta is working hard right now. He's only improving his value with the work ethic he's putting together. Doesn't hurt to score goals either, which he IS.

Oduya is a solid defenseman and has the potential to be a #2 defenseman on any team.

Madden is a top shutdown center. Any team in the league would be lucky to have him.

Corrente is our top defensive prospect.

Not a lot of quality my effing ear.

Crimson Devil* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-02-2008, 09:44 PM
  #27
CAPiTA
Lockout w/my C**kout
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,340
vCash: 500
Our 1st rounder
Hodgson
Edler

or

Luongo, straight up.

CAPiTA is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
12-02-2008, 10:24 PM
  #28
Jeffler
Ontario's Very Own
 
Jeffler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Downsview
Country: Canada
Posts: 15,602
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to Jeffler
Quote:
Originally Posted by WashJeffHockey19 View Post
"Waive"?
The joke is the Leafs are going to be the one with the pick

Jeffler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-03-2008, 06:47 AM
  #29
8thRoundPick
Registered User
 
8thRoundPick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sudbury
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,553
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lupe Fiasco View Post
That pick is going to be a Farm-Killer. If you want even the second overall pick, prepare to lose your Franchise player.
You highly overrate draft picks, as do most people on here. No GM is silly enough to give up their best proven NHLer for the best potential draft pick in this years draft.

A package containing three of;

- mid-to-top tier propects
- picks
- roster players that upgrade certain positions

...is what you'd see, most likely.

8thRoundPick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-03-2008, 06:55 AM
  #30
britdevil
Tea with milk...
 
britdevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Internets.
Posts: 18,315
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Confusious View Post
Not a lot of quality my effing ear.
Just stop posting on the trade board.

britdevil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-03-2008, 07:43 AM
  #31
8BostonRocker24
Registered User
 
8BostonRocker24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Los Gatos via Boston
Country: China
Posts: 8,869
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by tank4tavares View Post
1st overall pick in 09
A lot.
I'm a Boston fan. I can't see Boston being stupid enough to move all the way up to #1. If they did I would guess the package would be:

1. Boston's 2009 #1
2. Phil Kessel

I don't even know if that's enough. I'm a big (pun intended) Hedman fan. IMO, he's be the best defensive prospect since Chris Pronger. (This is no shoot at Phaneuf, I'm a fan)

8BostonRocker24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-03-2008, 07:51 AM
  #32
kyle evs48
No words needed
 
kyle evs48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: New Jersey
Country: United States
Posts: 27,937
vCash: 500
What makes everyone so sure that the teams owning the #1-2 picks will even discuss trading them?

kyle evs48 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-03-2008, 07:54 AM
  #33
8BostonRocker24
Registered User
 
8BostonRocker24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Los Gatos via Boston
Country: China
Posts: 8,869
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyle evs48 View Post
What makes everyone so sure that the teams owning the #1-2 picks will even discuss trading them?
IMO, They won't. The top 2 picks this year remind me of the Malkin-AO draft. Pittsburgh and Washington were not trading those picks.

But, HFBoards likes to play make-believe.

8BostonRocker24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-03-2008, 08:06 AM
  #34
kyle evs48
No words needed
 
kyle evs48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: New Jersey
Country: United States
Posts: 27,937
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8BostonRocker24 View Post
IMO, They won't. The top 2 picks this year remind me of the Malkin-AO draft. Pittsburgh and Washington were not trading those picks.

But, HFBoards likes to play make-believe.
Yeah. We're looking at a phenom forward and a phenom defenseman. It's less than likely that the organizations with the first two picks will even think about dealing them away.

kyle evs48 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-03-2008, 08:15 AM
  #35
Drake1588
UNATCO
 
Drake1588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 27,778
vCash: 500
The draft is two-deep at the top end this year, with franchise players at forward and defense.

So after the draft lottery, the value of the #1 overall pick is probably the #2 pick plus a sweetener.

On the one hand, that sweetener won't necessarily have to be very much. If the team sitting at #1 values both players and does not have a glaring positional need, while the team at #2 has a strong preference, a sweetener might be enough to give the team at #2 the peace of mind of certainty. The team sitting at #1 might be content to take either player at #2, and get a nice asset in the bargain.

Yet any team outside the top two probably isn't going to be in the conversation, with the kind of drop-off that seems to exist this year.

Drake1588 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-03-2008, 08:19 AM
  #36
LEIFey
Context Matters!
 
LEIFey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Country: United States
Posts: 7,143
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to LEIFey
i almost hope hedman has an awful season and falls to the flyers

LEIFey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-03-2008, 08:20 AM
  #37
dbhislife
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,085
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlwaysEndeavor View Post
Our 1st rounder
Hodgson
Edler

or

Luongo, straight up.
You need to terminate your account.

So over 10 years ago you would have done your franchise goalie for Daigle?

Honestly guys I dont care how good....you dont go proven for unproven


Last edited by dbhislife: 12-03-2008 at 08:36 AM.
dbhislife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-03-2008, 08:32 AM
  #38
Richter35
Registered User
 
Richter35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,313
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by dbhislife View Post
You need to terminate your account.

So over 30 years ago you would have done your franchise goalie for Daigle?

Honestly guys I dont care how good....you dont go proven for unproven
daigle was in '93 bud.

and yeah that would have looked like crap. I could see movement this year between the 3-7 positions (something like atlanta trading the 5th pick plus lehtinen for the 3rd overall and a later pick) but I really doubt any team would give up the chance of tavares and/or hedman, theyre just too good. Not Crosby good, but probably a notch above stamkos, and tbay wasnt going to move that pick at all.

Richter35 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-03-2008, 08:36 AM
  #39
kyle evs48
No words needed
 
kyle evs48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: New Jersey
Country: United States
Posts: 27,937
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richter35 View Post
daigle was in '93 bud.

and yeah that would have looked like crap. I could see movement this year between the 3-7 positions (something like atlanta trading the 5th pick plus lehtinen for the 3rd overall and a later pick) but I really doubt any team would give up the chance of tavares and/or hedman, theyre just too good. Not Crosby good, but probably a notch above stamkos, and tbay wasnt going to move that pick at all.
Overrated.

kyle evs48 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-03-2008, 08:37 AM
  #40
dbhislife
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,085
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richter35 View Post
daigle was in '93 bud.

and yeah that would have looked like crap. I could see movement this year between the 3-7 positions (something like atlanta trading the 5th pick plus lehtinen for the 3rd overall and a later pick) but I really doubt any team would give up the chance of tavares and/or hedman, theyre just too good. Not Crosby good, but probably a notch above stamkos, and tbay wasnt going to move that pick at all.
oops I was typing that as class ended and had to hed to my next one...I meant over 10 not thirty

dbhislife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-03-2008, 08:38 AM
  #41
dbhislife
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,085
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bergy4ever View Post
You highly overrate draft picks, as do most people on here. No GM is silly enough to give up their best proven NHLer for the best potential draft pick in this years draft.

A package containing three of;

- mid-to-top tier propects
- picks
- roster players that upgrade certain positions

...is what you'd see, most likely.
AMEN....I love the guys offering up Luongo or one of Ottawa's top 3. God I hope you all become GMs....the Panthers might actually win then

dbhislife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-03-2008, 01:54 PM
  #42
vippe
Registered User
 
vippe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sweden
Country: Sweden
Posts: 9,134
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to vippe
Quote:
Originally Posted by LEIFey View Post
i almost hope hedman has an awful season and falls to the flyers
Too bad he's having a great season then

vippe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-03-2008, 02:04 PM
  #43
Garfinkel1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: CT
Posts: 3,305
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlwaysEndeavor View Post
Our 1st rounder
Hodgson
Edler

or

Luongo, straight up.

Kings should tank and do this trade. Easily become an instant playoff contender.

Garfinkel1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-03-2008, 02:07 PM
  #44
Scrambllllle
Registered User
 
Scrambllllle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 335
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by danishh View Post
if ottawa has a top 5 pick, they probably keep the pick. If they dont, the only way they get that pick is by trading spezza. So, i'd say ottawa is out.
Sens wouldn't have to move Spezza to move up 3 spots in the draft.

Scrambllllle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-03-2008, 02:22 PM
  #45
isles31
Poster Excellont
 
isles31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: LI
Country: United States
Posts: 3,529
vCash: 500
isles trade...
mitch fritz
hilbert
tambellini
martinek


seriously, id do my best NOT to trade KO or Bailey so here it is.
isles 1st
isles 2nd
isles 2nd(from boston)

IF the isles arent top 5 theyre probably 6th

this probably isnt enough but with a few prospects in the deal not named okposo or bailey it might be close no? thats 3 high picks in a "deep" draft

isles31 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-03-2008, 03:06 PM
  #46
bang bang
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 315
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlwaysEndeavor View Post
Our 1st rounder
Hodgson
Edler

or

Luongo, straight up.
Luongo straight up wont get you tavares...

bang bang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-03-2008, 03:44 PM
  #47
Acekicker123
Registered User
 
Acekicker123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mississauga, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,507
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlwaysEndeavor View Post
Our 1st rounder
Hodgson
Edler

or

Luongo, straight up.
Oh baby, that's a pretty enticing offer.

Acekicker123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-03-2008, 05:27 PM
  #48
KevinP
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 128
vCash: 500
2009 first

I've already done this from the point of view of the Wings trading for one of the top two picks (to choose Hedman) and my deal was:

Filppula and Kronwall from the roster(helps clear cap space to have $$ to sign Zetts, Franzen, Hudler and hopefully Hossa)
+
Kindl and Emmerton(these two are sure fire NHLers. Some rate Kindl higer than Ericsson and Emmerton has all the tools)
+
2009 1st.

KevinP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-03-2008, 05:45 PM
  #49
IBleedOil247
Registered User
 
IBleedOil247's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: E-Town
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,056
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by OilGagner89 View Post
Oilers 1st
Horcoff
Grebeshkov
Nash
for Tavares

The sweet thing is, we may not have to give anything up for this pick!

IBleedOil247 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-03-2008, 05:50 PM
  #50
Petro Points
Registered User
 
Petro Points's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 12,727
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by IBleedOil247 View Post
The sweet thing is, we may not have to give anything up for this pick!
and it wouldnt surprise anyone in edmonton that we would be selecting a name other then Hedman or Tavares with that pick

Petro Points is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:36 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.