Quote:
Originally Posted by NickyZ
The problem I have with everyone always calling Drury a "natural winner" is that that criteria doesn't get applied to everyone else. Drury has 1 Stanley Cup in which he was a support player on possibly one of the most stacked teams in the past 30 years. Scott Gomez has 2 Stanley Cups in a situation where he was also a support player. Why doesn't everyone call Scott Gomez a "natural winner?" When you think of Scott Gomez is "natural winner" the first thing that comes to mind? No, but somehow with Drury everyone is obssesed with that term.
Jaromir Jagr won 2 Stanley Cups in which he was a star player and he and Mario carried the team to 2 championships. How come we don't call Jagr a "natural winner?" Or Hasek? Or any of the other hundreds of players who have won ONE or more championships? Why does this only get applied to Drury?
|
The reason is the same thing that drives me f'ing crazy about Drury. That God damned little league world series championship. It's the reason why I hate when the Rangers are on national broadcasts, Emrick or Benninatti can't go one frikking period without mentioning it.