Recchi on the Radar?..along with others

Legs Feed the Wolf · 03-03-2009, 07:44 PM

Per Zipay

http://weblogs.newsday.com/sports/hockey/rangers/blog/

Barker,Antropov,Neil,Hale ?

jniklast · 03-03-2009, 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Drury Fan

Per Zipay

http://weblogs.newsday.com/sports/hockey/rangers/blog/

Barker,Antropov,Neil,Hale ?

i'd like antropov the most of these

FLYLine24* · 03-03-2009, 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jniklast

i'd like antropov the most of these

Same.

MisterUnspoken · 03-03-2009, 07:52 PM

Barker would be a sick addition, D corps ftw

Xpaco08 · 03-03-2009, 07:52 PM

I dont want to pay the price that Burke wants for Antropov. Would love dealing for Barker and Neal. Not sure what each team would require. I know Chicago is looking for a center. Two they might have interest in are Betts and Korpi. Chances are Chicago just picks Morrison off of waivers.

FromDubiToZherdev* · 03-03-2009, 07:55 PM

Chris Neil, Nik Antropov, Cam Barker.

Yes to these.

No to Recchi. He has the record for goals against us.

Cherepanov 71 · 03-03-2009, 07:56 PM

Chicago wants a center, is that how we would get Barker?

I Eat Crow · 03-03-2009, 07:57 PM

I wouldn't mind Recchi for a late round pick. Nor for those other guys, except for Hale

NYR957 · 03-03-2009, 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherepanov 71

Chicago wants a center, is that how we would get Barker?

Blair Betts and a draft pick? I have no idea. Would that get it done?

NYR957 · 03-03-2009, 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FromDubiToZherdev

Chris Neil, Nik Antropov, Cam Barker.

Yes to these.

No to Recchi. He has the record for goals against us.

He also has 45 points in 62 games as a 41 year old. More than everyone on our team except for Gomez and Zherdev by a couple of points.

I Eat Crow · 03-03-2009, 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NYR957

Blair Betts and a draft pick? I have no idea. Would that get it done?

Someone brought up Girardi and Betts for Wisniewski and Brouwer in another thread. I think if you change Barker for Wisniewski, I think that would get it done. Barker is going to be a great player.

TheHotRock · 03-03-2009, 08:01 PM

i'll take rex. big body, not afraid to bang, could help the power play. at 300k if the price is a later pick, why not take a chance?

Legs Feed the Wolf · 03-03-2009, 08:02 PM

oh man this deadline is getting exciting....antropov, neil, barker OH MY

ThirdEye · 03-03-2009, 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NYR957

Blair Betts and a draft pick? I have no idea. Would that get it done?

Really... Betts?

They're going to want Dubinsky... and that's why we won't get him.

TheHotRock · 03-03-2009, 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThirdEye

Really... Betts?

They're going to want Dubinsky... and that's why we won't get him.

would you do it for korpikoski+? i'd think about it

Shark Staal · 03-03-2009, 08:05 PM

Antropov, yes. Barker, yes. Neil, yes, Recchi, Hell Yes. Hale, LOL No.

The reason I say "Hell Yes" about Recchi is, that he still produces, and would cost us the least.

NYR957 · 03-03-2009, 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThirdEye

Really... Betts?

They're going to want Dubinsky... and that's why we won't get him.

Hence the term "I have no idea". If Dubinsky then no.

Legs Feed the Wolf · 03-03-2009, 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheHotRock

would you do it for korpikoski+? i'd think about it

i would do it...barker is gonna be sick

ThirdEye · 03-03-2009, 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheHotRock

would you do it for korpikoski+? i'd think about it

Ehh... probably not. We need to keep our forwards. We have more than enough defensemen in the system already.

I think Chicago is looking for someone with experience anyhow

Fitzy · 03-03-2009, 08:07 PM

Been saying for awhile Recchi wouldnt surprise me. Probly best bang for the price tag as far as rentals this season. If we got him for a third then fine.

Vitto79 · 03-03-2009, 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GongShowHockeyNYR

Antropov, yes. Barker, yes. Neil, yes, Recchi, Hell Yes. Hale, LOL No.

The reason I say "Hell Yes" about Recchi is, that he still produces, and would cost us the least.

I guess he still does but still it would stink if he is the top 6 they think about bringing in

As of now I think the forward group is well balanced as long as the 3rd line can be Avery, Korps , Cally...........it would give alot of depth

Shark Staal · 03-03-2009, 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vitto79

I guess he still does but still it would stink if he is the top 6 they think about bringing in

As of now I think the forward group is well balanced as long as the 3rd line can be Avery, Korps , Cally...........it would give alot of depth

I would think if they got an Antropov type, that'll be the only move, but with a Recchi type, I can see a slew of trades....maybe.

Fitzy · 03-03-2009, 08:10 PM

Barker is scoring well, and is 22. Whats not to like?

SupersonicMonkey* · 03-03-2009, 08:11 PM

I would LOVE to get Barker.

Staal
Girardi
Barker
Sanguinetti
Del Zotto

Is a pretty nutty young D core.

OverTheCap · 03-03-2009, 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vitto79

I guess he still does but still it would stink if he is the top 6 they think about bringing in

As of now I think the forward group is well balanced as long as the 3rd line can be Avery, Korps , Cally...........it would give alot of depth

Agreed, and can Recchi even be considered a top 6 forward at this point? I'm not sure what role he would fill on this team. We already have a bunch of 3rd/4th liners.