HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > Philadelphia Flyers
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Upshall

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
04-03-2009, 03:30 AM
  #1
Hockeypete49
How you like me now!
 
Hockeypete49's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: South Jersey
Country: Isle of Man
Posts: 4,537
vCash: 500
Upshall

Well Scottie had the game winner last night. He has been playing really well since the trade. Other than the cap implications, I am still trying to figure out this move.

Hockeypete49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2009, 04:30 AM
  #2
chaosof99*
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Austria
Country: Austria
Posts: 16,614
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockeypete49 View Post
Well Scottie had the game winner last night. He has been playing really well since the trade. Other than the cap implications, I am still trying to figure out this move.
I wouldn't worry about this very much. It often happens that players just play better right after a trade. Emminger also had like two goals in a span of three games right after he got traded.

Why was he traded? Cap implications and him turning RFA after the season. Simple as that. It's sad that he was traded but eventually you'll get over it. Spilt milk isn't worth crying over.

chaosof99* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2009, 04:33 AM
  #3
Readyrock
(・_・;)
 
Readyrock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Country: United States
Posts: 1,708
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockeypete49 View Post
Well Scottie had the game winner last night. He has been playing really well since the trade.
He's getting more ice time and special teams minutes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockeypete49 View Post
Other than the cap implications, I am still trying to figure out this move.
There's nothing else to figure out. It was a cap move. It might've been a bad one, but it was a salary dump right before the deadline. We weren't expecting equal value back or anything.



I predict 20 pages if the thread doesn't get locked first. I'm game to read some populist outrage.

EDIT: Apologies to you, Hockeypete49. You're a newer poster, and I'm a little cynical.

Readyrock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2009, 06:42 AM
  #4
BigBanger
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 371
vCash: 500
There's nothing else to figure out. It was a cap move. It might've been a bad one, but it was a salary dump right before the deadline. We weren't expecting equal value back or anything.


Huh ??if you dont expect something of equal or better whats the point? we could of dumped Salery in a lot of different ways. This was bad end of season move questioned by everyone around NHL.

BigBanger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2009, 07:23 AM
  #5
Opus
Registered User
 
Opus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Kingston
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,920
vCash: 500
Other than cap implications, there is NOTHING to figure out.

Upshalls production (like Scrafo said) has been up since the trade, but so what. He's on the 2nd line, and getting PP minutes...two things he wasn't getting here. While I always liked him, you need to really look at his production while he was here, not what he's done since. It's irrelevant, IMO.

The move was made to keep Giroux here, as well.


Look at it this way...

Upshall, 2nd.

for...

Carcillo, Giroux.


Not saying it was the best way to dump salary, but at the time...it had to be done.

I miss Upshall like the next guy, but seriously, it's time to move on.

Opus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2009, 07:32 AM
  #6
LEIFey
Context Matters!
 
LEIFey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Country: United States
Posts: 7,312
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to LEIFey
scarfo, that is a disturbing avatar. flyers pirate themed lazy town?

i miss upshall a lot, and would love to see him in orange again in the future. carcillo plays a role that is different from scottie's, but i do know i would rather have upshall on richards's wing than carcillo.

LEIFey is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2009, 07:39 AM
  #7
tytech
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,355
vCash: 500
This trade burns me more than others that I don't agree with do.

Carcillo brings nothing more to the table than Upshall did and Carcillo gets to play with Richards, yet Upshall didn't? Upshall is much better than Carcillo offensively, has much more tenacity and drive and brings much more energy (less nastiness) to his game.

tytech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2009, 07:55 AM
  #8
flyers ltd
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 202
vCash: 500
Upshall looked like a game breaker in his 18 games after the trade back in 2006-2007. Then the Flyers became a good team and he was given his proper role. Really, if you are raving about him this time next year, your team will probably be in a similar position in the standings.

flyers ltd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2009, 08:22 AM
  #9
GKJ
Global Moderator
Entertainment
 
GKJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Do not trade plz
Country: United States
Posts: 111,097
vCash: 500
Why would we consider getting Giroux as part of the trade when he was already on the team, playing on the same line no less.

Two draft picks on one player.


I'll defer to my previous arguments on 'asset management'

GKJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2009, 08:28 AM
  #10
Lab Monkey
Registered User
 
Lab Monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,375
vCash: 500
I was totally against the Upshall trade at the time. Hated it. Called for Homers head on a platter. But like Opus said, if he wasn't moved Claude wouldn't be around right now. Upshall for Giroux is a trade I would do any day of the week. Best of luck to Scott, and I hope he continues to have success, but he WILL NOT win us a cup.

Lab Monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2009, 08:31 AM
  #11
TheDrizzle81
Registered User
 
TheDrizzle81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Marlton NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 5,358
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to TheDrizzle81
Jones = a better salary dump. Period.

TheDrizzle81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2009, 08:33 AM
  #12
GKJ
Global Moderator
Entertainment
 
GKJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Do not trade plz
Country: United States
Posts: 111,097
vCash: 500
How did it allow Giroux to be on the team? The game before the deadline we had a completely healthy roster (except Hatcher), everyone was on the team at the same time, which included Giroux.

GKJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2009, 08:46 AM
  #13
TheDrizzle81
Registered User
 
TheDrizzle81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Marlton NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 5,358
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to TheDrizzle81
Quote:
Originally Posted by go kim johnsson 514 View Post
How did it allow Giroux to be on the team? The game before the deadline we had a completely healthy roster (except Hatcher), everyone was on the team at the same time, which included Giroux.
I think it was more of an Injury flexibility plan for the stretch run. iuno. I would have traded Jones for a cheaper dman to create that flexibility.

TheDrizzle81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2009, 09:05 AM
  #14
sa cyred
Yea....the Flyers...
 
sa cyred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Traveling...
Country: Cuba
Posts: 15,626
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDrizzle81 View Post
I think it was more of an Injury flexibility plan for the stretch run. iuno. I would have traded Jones for a cheaper dman to create that flexibility.
This is correct. It really had nothing to do with Giroux. Giroux was on the team at the same time. It has to do with getting more cap space just incase someone got hurt. We did not have enough room, without sending Giroux down, to bring someone up.

As much as I like Upshall, and think Carcillo blows, this topic is so repetitive. If Carcillo stays on the 4th line, Ill be happy. Leave Asham on the 3rd line.


sa cyred is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2009, 09:48 AM
  #15
BigBanger
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 371
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDrizzle81 View Post
Jones = a better salary dump. Period.
Amen on that! talk about stealing money he must have great agent.

BigBanger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2009, 09:57 AM
  #16
TheDrizzle81
Registered User
 
TheDrizzle81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Marlton NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 5,358
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to TheDrizzle81
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigBanger View Post
Amen on that! talk about stealing money he must have great agent.
Id say. I mean there had to be something else to this Upshall deal than just salary, cuz Im sorry a similar trade but with Jones 4 a cheap Damn could have happened. or maybe not. Maybe we're all over analyzing this whole situation.

I was optimistic about the Upshall/Carcillo trade but man, wheres Carcillo been since the trade? And I keep hearing about Upshall lighting the lamp and playing great for Phoenix. I really think we could use Scotties energy right now. The guy never took a **** off. But w/e it is what it is, heres to hoping Carcillo heats up for the playoffs.

TheDrizzle81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2009, 10:29 AM
  #17
FlyHigh
Registered User
 
FlyHigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 28,156
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to FlyHigh Send a message via MSN to FlyHigh
See, everybody wants to trade Jones and I support that in the offseason, but if you traded him before the deadline, who replaces him? Syvret? Guenin?

And don't say Vaananen because the Vaananen-Alberts pairing was pretty damn bad.

FlyHigh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2009, 10:33 AM
  #18
TheDrizzle81
Registered User
 
TheDrizzle81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Marlton NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 5,358
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to TheDrizzle81
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyHigh View Post
See, everybody wants to trade Jones and I support that in the offseason, but if you traded him before the deadline, who replaces him? Syvret? Guenin?

And don't say Vaananen because the Vaananen-Alberts pairing was pretty damn bad.
I was saying to trade Jones for a cheap dman. A replacement kinda like Upshall for Carcillo. I would have voted for Kukkonen to replace Jones if we just dumped Jones.

TheDrizzle81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2009, 10:43 AM
  #19
RJ8812
Gunner Stahl #9
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sudbury
Country: Canada
Posts: 25,533
vCash: 500
omg...get over the trade!

upshall is nothing special. he's getting ice-time in PHO because they suck. he put up the points with us aswell when he got him during our terrible season

RJ8812 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2009, 11:01 AM
  #20
Dig Out Your Soul
Ex Storm...
 
Dig Out Your Soul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Country: Canada
Posts: 23,075
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by RJ8812 View Post
omg...get over the trade!

upshall is nothing special. he's getting ice-time in PHO because they suck. he put up the points with us aswell when he got him during our terrible season
So what does this mean? Let the kid play on a scoring line and he can produce - something very valuable in case a top 6 player gets hurt in the playoffs.

But if he's not playing on a scoring line and produces less - he stays cheap! Retarded salary dump. Versatile and cheap player for practically nothing (don't give me this Giroux crap, that's been proven wrong 100 times).

Dig Out Your Soul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2009, 11:06 AM
  #21
UseYourAllusion
Registered User
 
UseYourAllusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Philly
Country: United States
Posts: 6,873
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dig Out Your Soul View Post
So what does this mean? Let the kid play on a scoring line and he can produce - something very valuable in case a top 6 player gets hurt in the playoffs.

But if he's not playing on a scoring line and produces less - he stays cheap! Retarded salary dump. Versatile and cheap player for practically nothing (don't give me this Giroux crap, that's been proven wrong 100 times).
Has the Giroux crap be proven wrong? I seem to remember a couple games where Kimmo sat with the flu and we had to send Giroux down just to call up Nate Guenin.

UseYourAllusion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2009, 11:07 AM
  #22
Jester
Registered User
 
Jester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: St. Andrews
Country: Scotland
Posts: 34,075
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyHigh View Post
See, everybody wants to trade Jones and I support that in the offseason, but if you traded him before the deadline, who replaces him? Syvret? Guenin?

And don't say Vaananen because the Vaananen-Alberts pairing was pretty damn bad.
This is why you trade Lupul. Short-term and long-term helps the salary cap, paired with the fact that Briere theoretically "replaces" his offense in the lineup.

Gagne-Richards-Knuble
Hartnell-Carter-Briere
Upshall-Giroux-Powe/Asham

I would be a happy camper...nevermind that I think we should have fixed this problem a bit sooner so that we could have kept Metro, who was perfectly fine as a 3rd line center.

Jester is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2009, 11:11 AM
  #23
Dig Out Your Soul
Ex Storm...
 
Dig Out Your Soul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Country: Canada
Posts: 23,075
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by UseYourAllusion View Post
Has the Giroux crap be proven wrong? I seem to remember a couple games where Kimmo sat with the flu and we had to send Giroux down just to call up Nate Guenin.
What I mean is when people say "Upshall and a 2nd for Carcillo and Giroux". That's utter BS.

Yeah, there's a point to be made that we needed cap space for an injury call-up. However (and I've said this before), I would've rather sent Giroux down for two games if Kimmo has the flu and keep Upshall for a playoff run. What's the big deal in that? Are we at the point where Giroux is so essential to our success that we can't send him down for a few days?

We're 7-7 since the trade deadline and have been fortunate to win some of those games. I don't think we've looked like the same team as before the deadline.

Dig Out Your Soul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2009, 11:13 AM
  #24
BigBanger
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 371
vCash: 500
Dig out your soul... crap this is off topic but DaMM , your Avatar gives me a *****,

BigBanger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-03-2009, 11:15 AM
  #25
UseYourAllusion
Registered User
 
UseYourAllusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Philly
Country: United States
Posts: 6,873
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dig Out Your Soul View Post
What I mean is when people say "Upshall and a 2nd for Carcillo and Giroux". That's utter BS.

Yeah, there's a point to be made that we needed cap space for an injury call-up. However (and I've said this before), I would've rather sent Giroux down for two games if Kimmo has the flu and keep Upshall for a playoff run. What's the big deal in that? Are we at the point where Giroux is so essential to our success that we can't send him down for a few days?

We're 7-7 since the trade deadline and have been fortunate to win some of those games. I don't think we've looked like the same team as before the deadline.
Correlation does not equal causation. If losing their 9th best forward really made that much of a difference to this team they have much bigger problems than the Upshall trade.

UseYourAllusion is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:02 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.